Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Friday, Dec 12, 2003

News
Features
Stocks
Port Info
Archives

Group Sites

Corporate - Regulatory Bodies & Rulings
Government - Policy


Decks cleared for BIFR closure

Our Bureau

New Delhi , Dec. 11

THE process of closing down the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) and Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR) took a major step forward on Thursday, with the Lok Sabha giving its nod for the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) (SICA) Repeal Bill. The Bill envisaged dissolution of BIFR and AAIFR.

SICA was enacted in 1985 to tackle the problem of industrial sickness. However, in view of the problems noticed in the BIFR mechanism, the Government had been considering various alternatives, including repealing SICA and enacting a separate legislation, to address the problems of industrial sickness more effectively.

The Bill outlined some of the deficiencies noticed in the operation of SICA as excessive protection to sick industries under Section 22 of SICA, providing for automatic stay of all proceedings; necessity of consensus amongst secured creditors before finalising the scheme; lack of monitoring of sanctioned revival scheme; and delays in winding up. In order to overcome the deficiencies in the SICA, the Government came out with amendments to the Companies Act, 1956, establishing the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

The task of rehabilitating sick industrial units would now be vested with the NCLT. The NCLT with several benches, and appeal on its judgment lying before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, would take over the jurisdiction of High Courts in the matters of liquidation of sick companies, abrogation of the Company Law Board, and rehabilitation of companies. Besides, it also provides that both rehabilitation and winding-up of sick companies will take place within a timeframe of a maximum of two years as against the existing system taking about 18 to 20 years.

Cases pending with BIFR were those in which 100 per cent net worth of the companies had eroded. While under NCLT, companies with erosion of 50 per cent of net worth would be automatically referred to the Tribunal. Further, under NCLT, a special provision has been included to protect workers' dues and interests, which was lacking under SICA, the Finance Minister, Mr Jaswant Singh, said.

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication

Stories in this Section
Tecumseh to hike capacity at Hyderabad plant


Govt to notify accounting standard soon
IVRCL board okays pvt placement to Citicorp, Chryscapital
`CA Act amendment Bill to be referred to standing panel'
TCC, Kerala Feeds among winners of energy awards
Wimco VRS
Auto components sector — A journey from wilderness to the West
Tatas to retain 4 pc in Haldia Petro
Jain Irrigation set to implement Sri Lanka's greenhouse project
Decks cleared for BIFR closure
Strides, Italian co pact for drug plant
`Spread liberalisation over time to help domestic industry'
Antony writes to Centre, lists measures to salvage FACT
Hyundai Motor to roll out millionth car by 2006
Kinetic eyes larger share of motorcycle market
Toyota mulling launch of pick-up vans, trucks
LML Freedom mobike sales up 30 pc in Karnataka
U.P. Singh is new MD of Bokaro Steel Plant


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |

Copyright © 2003, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line