Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Wednesday, Apr 28, 2004

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Industry & Economy - Taxation


Chamber feels there's no need to cut TDS on dealer rebates

Richa Mishra
K.R. Srivats

New Delhi , April 27

THE PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PHDCCI) has taken a position that manufacturers should not be required to deduct tax at source on the rebates or discounts offered by them to their dealers and distributors.

The chamber said that the discount/rebate allowed by a manufacturer to distributors/dealers cannot be termed as ``commission'' and the provision of Section 194 H of the Income Tax Act cannot be made applicable in such a situation.

It is of the view that there was no default on the part of a manufacturer in not deducting tax on the rebates/discounts offered at the time of sale of goods to dealers/distributors.

In a representation to the Finance Ministry, the chamber said that a distributor/dealer purchases a manufacturer's product on principal-to-principal basis and re-sells it in the market for a profit. The relationship between a manufacturer and distributors/dealers is not of principal and agent.

Further, it has been highlighted that the ownership of goods passes to the dealers/distributors at the time of transfer of goods to such dealers/distributors.

``Rebates/discounts are given by the manufacturer to improve the margin available to the dealer/distributor. It is to be appreciated that, while commission is an income of the recipient the moment it accrues, rebate and discount are of a different nature. Rebate and discount merely reduce the cost of a product. They translate into income only when the said product is sold by the person who received the rebate/discount,'' the chamber said.

It also said that Section 194 H of the Act was applicable in the case of commission or brokerage paid to a person acting on behalf of another person. It is of the view that only a payment made in pursuance of an agency agreement or brokerage paid would be governed by the provisions of Section 194 H of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Sources said that the chamber's representation to the Finance Ministry came after the tax department had issued notices to certain manufacturers, seeking explanation as to why they had not deducted tax at source under Section 194 H on the discounts provided to their dealers/distributors.

More Stories on : Taxation | Industry Associations

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Dr Reddy's LABS set up in Vietnam


Summer rains return for varied spells in Kerala
Mumbai waste management project yet to gather pace
Reliance Dahanu plant to operate only for a year
Move to curb Pamba river pollution
Microbicides: HIV killers in the making
`Lung cancer tops in cancer-related deaths'
BPCL chief does not foresee petro price hike
GAIL gas cut to hit Regency Ceramics
Chamber feels there's no need to cut TDS on dealer rebates
Credit rating for SMEs soon
Scrapping of subsidy on natural rubber export urged
Finance Ministry views sought on FM radio licence fee deferment
Luxury car sales surge in Kerala
FIEO to take up rupee upswing with RBI soon
Watershed project to be expanded to more villages of Rajasthan, M.P.
Meet on downsizing tech at Surathkal
Thiruvananthapuram engagements
Prospects bleak for grain exports this fiscal
APTDC to organise 5-day summer fete



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2004, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line