Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Thursday, Aug 26, 2004

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Opinion - Accountancy


A slimming exercise or simply weight shifting?

N. R. Moorthy

N. R. Moorthy says that the Concept Paper makes a good beginning at reforming company law but has many a glitch in its contents

THE concept paper on the Companies Bill, 2004 is like curate's egg — good in parts.

A good beginning has been made by weeding outmoded and redundant sections. This is as it should be. Another plus point is the simplicity of language, avoiding the need for interpretation.

However, in the era of deregulation and liberalisation, more encroachments have been made on shareholders' rights and the regulator has assumed powers hitherto enjoyed by the shareholders.

The damning feature of the Bill is that in an attempt to slim the Act drastically, the theme and thrust of the Act has been shifted to delegated legislation, a heinous practice.

If one were to take into account the rules and schedules along with the Act, the whole legislation will be bulkier.A look now at some of the salient features of the Bill:

  • `Accounting Standards' (clause 2(2)) means the standards of accounting prescribed by the Central Government in consultation with the National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards constituted under sub-section (6) of Section 53 of the Bill.

    This means that the standards prescribed by the ICAI have no mandatory application. This piggyback approach will downgrade the ICAI, another arm of the same regulator.

  • `Books of accounts' — powers are delegated to prescribe these, so one may have to wait to know what these are.

  • `Company liquidator' — a professional or a professional firm can be appointed as a liquidator.

  • `Financial year' — cannot be less than six months nor more than 15 months, so extension up to 18 months has been done away with.

  • `Free reserves' are those reserves net of accumulated loses and expenses not written off which are free for distribution by way of dividend but shall not include balances to the credit of securities premium account accepted and share application money. Treatment of revaluation of assets is in limbo.

  • `Independent director' (Section 2(45)) — at long last some definition, but such directors are at the mercy of the rule-making authorities since they have been empowered to fix, inter alia, "the attributes to identify a person as `independent director'".

    In what way the Central Government is competent to decide in which companies substantial shareholding interest, public borrowings and institution funding which constitute public interest are involved.

    This is a matter to be decided on a case-by-case basis and the wisdom of the shareholders should prevail.

  • `Promoter' has been defined for the first time (Section 2(67)). The definition appears to have been borrowed from the takeover code. Strangely, a person who is not a shareholder or member can fall under this definition. This by itself needs discussion, as there are bundles of discrepancies in other regulations.

  • `Remuneration' (Section 2(77)) means any money or money's worth incurred by the company for using services rendered by the recipients and shall also include:

    i) any expenditure incurred by the company in providing rent-free accommodation free of charge, any expenditure incurred by the company in providing any other benefit, amenity or annuity free of charge or at a concessional rate.

    ii) expenses incurred by the company to effect any insurance on the life of, or to provide to, any person annuity or gratuity for his spouse or child.

    This definition will have a wide-reaching effect. Many companies that are on the borderline of maximum remuneration and those employing relatives of employees (Section 314 of the Act) may have to revisit this area for a review.

    Other features

    Companies can commence business without obtaining any certificate of commencement of business; merely passing a special resolution and filing it with the Registrar of Companies (RoC) is all that is required.

    For the formation of a company, the minimum amount to be subscribed for the memorandum is Rs 1 lakh and the subscription money has to be paid within a month.

    Cost auditor: Can be appointed only at general meetings, not by the board as hitherto, and must hold a certificate of practice.

    Independent director: Companies should have little less than 50 per cent of the total number of directors, which will mean that companies having seven and nine directors can have three or four respectively.

    Their attributes, duties and functions will be governed by subordinate legislation.

    Secretarial compliance (clause 87 of the Bill): Appointment of secretary mandatorily and the appointment of company secretaries in whole-time practice for compliance certificate are all grouped.

    Company secretaries appointed under the mandatory provisions should be in whole-time employment of the company.

    Nobody can be company secretary of two companies.

    Auditor disqualification (Clause 58): Among the grounds of disqualification, the most pernicious one relates to the powers delegated to the Central Government to prescribe other disqualification grounds. An unacceptable suggestion.

    Articles of association and memorandum of association (AoA and MoA): Companies were at a liberty to amend, alter or substitute the set of AoA by merely passing a special resolution and filing it with the RoC.

    Curiously, clause 87 of the Bill proposes, inter alia, that such alterations will have to be registered with the RoC and they will take effect only upon such registration.

    This infringes on the fundamental rights of the company to run its business the way the owners want. And where substantial public interest in involved, the proposal appears particularly ridiculous.

    Inter-corporate loans: Clause 76 embraces even private companies. Privileges enjoyed by them (through exemption from the purview of Section 372A) are withdrawn. On one side, there is talk of simplification and deregulation and, on the other, fresh areas of government control are sought to be brought in.

    Penal provisions: Penalties for offences under various provisions are brought under one section.

    This is a good attempt at streamlining, but at the same time there is a provision for payment of minimum penalty, which will encourage corruption and nepotism.

    This may even amount to encroachment on the fundamental rights of the judiciary to decide cases purely on merits.

    (The author is a Pune-based company secretary.)

    More Stories on : Accountancy | Company Law

    Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



  • Stories in this Section
    A taxing strike


    Warrant: Be on guard!
    Ensuring speedy justice — Filling up vacancies
    Capital formation and P&P sector — The inconsistencies and adjustments
    Don't confuse capabilities with activities, nor intangibles with unmeasurables
    A slimming exercise or simply weight shifting?
    There is a trigger behind the mercies
    The bull in the numbers
    To write a good opinion, you need the right mental attitude
    Cartoon
    Accounting norms
    Merging companies



    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

    Copyright © 2004, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line