Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Wednesday, Sep 08, 2004

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Industry & Economy - Power


HC restrains TNERC from reopening power pacts issue

Our Legal Correspondent

Chennai , Sept. 7

THE Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission's order directing the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board to fix "fair price" for the power purchased by it from independent power producers has been stayed by the Madras High Court.

The interim stay has been granted by Mr Justice N. Balasubramanian on a writ petition preferred by PPN Power Generating Co Ltd, Chennai, challenging, inter alia, the jurisdiction of the first respondent (TN Electricity Regulatory Commission) in entertaining the representation of the second respondent, former Tamil Nadu DMK MLA Mr Nellikuppam V. Krishnamurthy pleading for fixing the fair price for power purchased from independent power producers (IPP).

Contending that the commission had erred in passing an order dated July 21, 2004, asking the TNEB to fix the fair price for the power purchased from the IPPs, including the present writ petitioner, the petitioner questioned the jurisdiction of the commission to entertain the application filed by the second respondent when the second respondent was not a party to the power purchase agreement between the petitioner and the TNEB.

The petitioner company was generating electricity and had entered into a power purchase agreement on January 3, 1997, with the TNEB (third respondent). It went into commercial operation on April 26, 2001, and had been supplying power to the board.

According to the petitioner, the TNEB had filed a Tariff Revision Petition (TRP No 1 of 2002) before the commission for revision of tariff, and in pursuance of the same, the commission called for objections, if any, from the public. There were 478 applications from the public, including one from the second respondent. After public hearings, the commission passed an order dated March 15, 2003, to the TNEB for implementation.

When the TRP No 1 of 2002 was pending, the second respondent filed the Miscellaneous Petition (MP No 1 of 2003) seeking relief by way of fixing the fair price for the power purchased from the IPPs.

The petitioner said that the first respondent, before hearing the arguments of all the respondents, passed an order on July 21, 2004, rejecting the contentions of the petitioner and others on the preliminary issue of jurisdiction and locus standi of the second respondent and upheld the argument of the second respondent.

Arguing the case of the petitioner, Mr Aravind M. Subramaniam, counsel, pointed out that the commission had exceeded its jurisdiction in deciding the issues that had been decided in TRP No 1, which covered the tariff to be charged to the consumers of the TNEB and the issue of purchase of power from various sources, including the petitioner, and had merely used this miscellaneous petition as a ruse to include issues which had never been pleaded nor raised before the commission.

The commission had erred in coming to the conclusion that under the Commission's New Business Conduct Regulations, 2004, it had the power to entertain petitions from interested persons, when no such power was conferred under the Electricity Act, 2003.

Hence, the powers assumed under the Business Conduct Regulations, 2004 were ultra vires the Act. The second respondent was not procuring electricity from the petitioner directly and could not have any grievance against the petitioner.

The second respondent had, therefore, no locus standi except that he had to take up the matter of fair price with the TNEB from whom he was procuring electricity.

The petitioner further submitted that unless it was established that the power purchase agreement had been executed in violation of the provisions of statute or opposed to public policy, the Commission could not re-determine the cost of purchase of electricity by the TNEB from the petitioner.

The petitioner prayed for stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the orders passed on July 21, 2004 in MP No 1 of 2003 pending disposal of the writ petition.

More Stories on : Power | Courts/Legal Issues

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
700 Indian workers lose jobs in Abu Dhabi as co shuts shop


YSR sees bright future for bio-diesel plantations — Jatropha seeds to be paid Rs 6 per kg
Mid-term review of dumping duty on Vitamin A begins
Inflation: Emerging economies different
Jaswant Singh faults Govt on inflation
Religion is the word
Environment Ministry failing in its role, say NGOs
Kochi civic panel moots creation of environment divn
New vistas in TB treatment
Cheap cochlear implants from AP naval laboratory
Health cover for Andhra Bank credit cardholders
Global fund for AIDS calls for more corporate proposals
GSPC hopes to start online gas trading by December
Cooking crisis
Plastic goods, polymers at loggerheads
HC restrains TNERC from reopening power pacts issue
Gulf NRIs urge withdrawal of proposal to tax deposits
It's back home for textile exporters as quotas go
National meet on school computer study in Chennai
Singapore woos Indian students
Paris Biz School in tie-up talks with ICFAI Press
EMC (Kerala) to support projects
Sigma to set up Rs 120-cr shopping mall in Bangalore
Dubai firm keen on executing infrastructure projects in AP
Parliament march planned by All-India State Government Employees Federation
Sustainable development tops energy meet agenda
`People-centred' draft policy on service delivery ready
In Hyderabad today
Edible oil imports top 4 lakh t in Aug
Exporters taking forward cover
Plan to rebate education cess on export goods



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2004, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line