Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Friday, Oct 08, 2004 |
||
|
|
||
|
Opinion
-
Letters Business law
This is with reference to "First law of business is to know the law right" (Business Line, October 7). The article in is interesting in that it raises several legal issues that have arisen in the Federal Bank proceedings. The opinion Mr. N.R. Sridharan has been cited on many issues. However, one is unable to find any specific case in Ramayya that has direct precedent for the question on the timeliness of a notice under Section 257 of the Company Act. One tends to think that Section 10 of the General Clauses Act does not apply to Section 257 for the reason that the two Sections are significantly different in their phrasing and apply to different situations. My analysis of the sections follows:
There is a difference between the wording of the two Sections. Section 10 of the GC Act applies to cases (other than under the Limitation Act) where the act or proceeding in question is to be done on a certain day or within a prescribed period. M S Parthasarathy
Letters to the editor and contributions can be sent by e-mail to: bleditor@thehindu.co.in
More Stories on : Letters | Company Law
Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page
|
Stories in this Section |
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2004, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line
|