Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Saturday, Mar 12, 2005

News
Features
Stocks
Port Info
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Corporate - Corporate Governance


Corporate governance: Clarity on Clause 49 likely

Richa Mishra
K.R. Srivats

New Delhi , March 11

THE Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Chairman, Mr M. Damodaran, on Friday met the Company Affairs Minister, Mr Prem Chand Gupta, raising hopes of an early solution to the contentious issues surrounding the revised Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement on corporate governance norms.

The SEBI had already declared that the revised Clause 49 of listing agreement would come into effect from April 1. The Ministry, however, had been raising concerns on certain aspects of the revised Clause 49, including the issue of extent of independent director representation on corporate boards.

Asked to comment on his first interaction with the MCA top brass, the SEBI Chairman told Business Line that the meeting was a "courtesy call." He also held that there were no detailed discussions on any regulations or rules.

On whether any board meeting of SEBI was in the offing, Mr Damodaran said that the SEBI board would meet on March 23 in Mumbai. This meeting would assume significance as the MCA has been making a case for keeping the implementation of the revised clause 49 in abeyance till the enactment of a new company law.

The previous board meeting of SEBI, which was held in Delhi in January, saw the Company Affairs Ministry raising the issue of extent of independent director representation in company boards under the revised Clause 49.

At that meeting, the MCA had highlighted that the existing Companies Act did not have a comprehensive definition of an independent director and that the Act did not stipulate that a corporate board should have 50 per cent representation from independent directors.

The revised Clause 49 stipulated that at least 50 per cent of a company's board should comprise independent directors. The Ministry had contended that the listing agreement though binding on companies had lesser legal sanctity than the Companies Act.

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page


Stories in this Section
BHEL R&D initiatives start paying off — To market software for power stations with TCS


Friends Globe eyes retail travel services
Wockhardt gets USFDA nod for anti-ulcer drug
LIC plans to convert OFCDs
Emcure launches first 3-in-1 AIDS pill for kids
HC discharges caveatable interest of 3 Birlas over Priyamvada will
Intl refiner award for Reliance
HC appoints special officer to take stock of Birla assets
`Cos should create emotional appeal to build up image'
Ma Foi plans to acquire small, mid-size HR firms
Making MTNL a subsidiary of BSNL is best option: ICICI Sec
Dishman to acquire UK firm
Corporate governance: Clarity on Clause 49 likely
Education, code of conduct to beat corruption stressed
M&M eyeing AP to locate Logan car plant
GM expands Halol plant capacity
GAIL strikes jt venture deal with Syrian co
Mirza Tanners plans Rs 100-cr diversification — `Red Tape' retail stores to be set up
Sika to promote usage of chemicals in construction
Ivax Corp keen to expand tie-ups in India
IDEB Construction keen to partner foreign cos
Ranbaxy's R&D chief Rajinder Kumar quits
Corporate cricket in Mumbai


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2005, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line