![]() Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Saturday, Oct 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opinion
-
Income Tax Why bond with the bad T. N. Pandey
THE UPA Government appears keen on formulating schemes to tap black money, in compliance with the mandate of the National Common Minimum Programme (NCMP). In this direction, two schemes were announced in Budget 2005 namely, a tax on withdrawals from banks over prescribed limits; and asking banks to report about all deposits whose interest is exempt from TDS. About the tax on withdrawals, the Finance Minister's speeches in Parliament seem to indicate that it may be withdrawn if not successful. The second measure is merely cosmetic and is only likely to generate more paperwork for banks and the I-T Department. There are reports now that the Government is toying with the idea of a disclosure scheme of floating bonds for a fixed period maybe of 5-7 years for being subscribed to by tax-evaders and black money hoarders, with no explanation needed about the source of the money invested. The only drawback would be that no interest will be paid on the bonds for the period for which the money remains with the Government. The disadvantage of not paying interest would, according to the Government, remove the stigma attached to Voluntary Disclosure Schemes. Following VDIS 1997, the Government had committed to the Supreme Court that it would not introduce any more disclosure schemes. But such a scheme, if floated, may still stand judicial scrutiny because of the the Supreme Court decisions in R. K. Garg vs UOI & Ors. (1982 133 ITR 239) concerning Special Bearer Bonds Act, 1981 and All India Federation of Tax Practitioners & Ors. vs UOI & Ors. (1998 231 ITR 24) relating to VDIS 1997. In these decisions, the constitutional validity of voluntary disclosures with immunity from penal provisions was upheld. However, a democratically elected government has to assess the overall moral and social impact of such decisions. The proposal of floating interest-free bearer bonds is objectionable for the following reasons:
"It has been held by this court in Royappa (AIR 1974 SC 555) and Maneka Gandhi (AIR 1978 SC 597) that the principle of reasonableness does not exclude notions of morality and ethics..."
Thus, issue of bonds for getting tax evaded money for use by the Government for some time would be most unwise. Besides going back on the assurance to the Supreme Court that there would be no tax amnesty schemes in future, it would have a demoralising effect on law-abiding taxpayers. (The author is a former Chairman of CBDT.)
Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page
|
Stories in this Section |
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2005, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line
|