Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Friday, Oct 20, 2006
ePaper


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Money & Banking - Courts/Legal Issues
Web Extras - Private Banks
Centurion, LKB merger challenged

K.C. Gopakumar

Kochi , Oct. 19

A shareholder of Lord Krishna Bank on Wednesday approached the Kerala High Court challenging the decision taken at the AGM of the bank to merge it with Centurion Bank of Punjab.

The petition was filed by Mr Umesha Kumar Pai of Ernakulam, who holds 200 equity shares in the bank.

The petitioner sough a direction to the Central Government to appoint inspectors to investigate the affairs of the bank after making a declaration under Section 237 of the Companies Act that the affairs of the bank should be investigated.

He said that the most of the shareholders were prevented from participating in the AGM held on September 30.

The meeting had hastily transacted all the eight items on the agenda, including the merger resolution, violating all the company laws.According to the petitioner, no discussion was allowed on the merger proposal and no independent Chairman was appointed as per the norms in the case of an amalgamation scheme approved by the High Court.

He alleged that the shareholders were not given an opportunity to discuss the affairs and review the working of the bank.

Elections to the vacancies of directors, appointment of statutory auditors and amalgamation of the bank were all transacted in a "very oppressive manner."The petitioner pointed out that the audited balance sheet was passed without any discussion.

The merger resolution was passed in violation of the provisions of Section 44A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

This section prescribes the presence of two-thirds of shareholders either in person or by proxy for passing amalgamation resolution.

The petitioner also alleged that the voting was not conducted in a free and fair manner.

He said that the exchange value for the swap ratio was not discussed, nor was any methodology for this deliberated.

The petitioner also said that guidelines issued by the RBI on February 3, 2004 impose a restriction on the acquisition or transaction of more than five per cent shares to a single entity. Therefore, shares in the name of the late Ashwin Kumar Puri were transferred to Mr Mohan Puri in violation of the guidelines.

More Stories on : Courts/Legal Issues | Private Banks | Mergers & Acquisitions

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
A Nobel model that links peace and economics


Centurion, LKB merger challenged
Rupee gains marginally
Canara Bank net rises; core banking is driver
Dewan Housing net rises 23 pc
IDBI net 6 pc higher in Q2
HDFC net up 23% in Q2
Interest income lifts Kotak Bank net
AIG Capital gets NBFC licence
Bancassurance pact renewed
Indian Bank to sell gold coins
Canara sees good pricing for issue
Bond prices flat
Call rates up on tight liquidity
RBI cancels urban co-op bank licence


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2006, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line