Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Wednesday, Dec 20, 2006 ePaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry & Economy
-
Infrastructure Web Extras - Taxation Kamal Nath defends SEZs Our Bureau
"The initial response to the SEZ policy was tremendous with the State Governments showing a lot of zeal for the scheme"
New Delhi , Dec. 19 The criticism against special economic zones (SEZs) was entirely "misplaced and the propaganda against SEZs is not based on facts," the Union Commerce & Industry Minister, Mr Kamal Nath, said here. Presiding over the Parliamentary Consultative Committee attached to his Ministry, Mr Nath emphasised that SEZs were engines of growth, which would lead to creation of employment on a large scale through the generation of additional economic activity, development of infrastructure, promotion of investment and exports of goods and services.
SEZ Policy
He said that the SEZ policy as embedded in the SEZ Act 2005 bolstered by the SEZ Rules 2006 were purported mainly to provide a "One Stop Shop" doing away with numerous controls and clearances, along with fiscal concessions and simplified procedures. Mr Nath pointed out that the initial response to the SEZ policy was tremendous with the State Governments showing a lot of zeal for the scheme. Over 650 proposals were received from 21 States and three Union Territories (UTs) till now that entail investors from both within the country and abroad. Of these, 237 approvals have been granted, spread over 17 States and two UTs and 51 SEZs were notified. He said a large number of these SEZs cover textiles and apparels, leather footwear, auto components, engineering and other sector specific SEZs that would involve labour intensive manufacturing. The employment projected in these 51 notified SEZs would be over five lakhs, he added. Responding to queries concerning land issues, Mr Nath made it clear that the Central Government had not acquired any land for SEZs. "It is the States which acquire land for various purposes, viz, roads, hospitals, industrial areas and ports and have their own relief and rehabilitation policy." In this regard, the Minister deplored the tendency to link all land issues with SEZs and cited the case of Singur in West Bengal, which had nothing to do with SEZ, being a standalone industrial project of the State Government. He also clarified that any investment in SEZs must be new investment with new machinery and other new facilities. On the issue of revenue loss, Mr Nath explained that for infrastructure developers tax benefits already exist even outside the SEZs.
In response to a member's query about allowing foreign direct investment in SEZs for the manufacture of cigarettes, Mr Nath said that 100 per cent FDI was allowed for manufacturing provided the manufacture was for exports. This would also benefit the tobacco farmers in the country, he said.
More Stories on :
Infrastructure |
Taxation
Article
E-Mail
::
Comment
::
Syndication
::
Printer Friendly Page
|
Stories in this Section |
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2006, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line
|