Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Friday, Feb 02, 2007 ePaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
-
Interview
D. Murali
When Business Line posed these questions to Mr Roy Montague-Jones of the London-based law firm, Reed Smith Richards Butler LLP, he suggests that there may have been a stipulation in the detailed rules of the auction set by the Takeover Panel that the bids in the individual rounds would not be announced. He cites the Panel's announcement of January 26 thus: "It is expected that the increased bids (if any) lodged during the auction procedure will not be publicly announced by any of the parties... " The only exceptions to this gag are the final bids, points out Mr Montague-Jones. "I don't think there is any incentive for the parties to leak details of the auction - the only bids that matter are the final ones," he says. "Any leak would be likely to be traced back to its source and could be the subject of public censure by the Panel, which everyone would want to avoid." It is debatable though whether auction details should be transparent, to facilitate the process of price discovery, as in the case of auctions at Christie's or stock markets. Just imagine, what a nice double helix we would have got on a graph, if only we had been armed with pairs of competing bids in the shootout phase of the Corus deal.
More Stories on : Interview | Mergers & Acquisitions | Steel | Tata Steel Ltd
Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page
|
Stories in this Section |
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2007, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line
|