Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 ePaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opinion
-
Human Resources Making civil services citizen-centric R. Sundaram
Need for reforms
Ever since the Fifth Pay Commission's report in 1997 introduced the euphemistic and, perhaps, fashionable terms such as `enablers' and `facilitators' to replace the un-edifying `inspectors' and `controllers' to herald changes in the attitude of administrators, it has become customary to for political masters to mouth these shibboleths whenever they address gatherings where the subject matter is public administration.
No transformation
It is almost three years since the second Administrative Reforms Commission was constituted and, yet, there have been no transformation in the civil services. This is not to take away the credit due to the Administrative Reforms Commission in incorporating the Right To Information in the fabric of administrative procedures.
Of enablers and facilitators
Although reconstituting the civil service and making it citizen-centric was a major, if not the central, task given to the Commission, it appears not being able to make much headway. Can, then, the civil service be transformed in the near future? Not only will the present incumbents oppose change tooth and nail but vested interests, even among the political classes, will resist them. If the politics of governance is stymied by the politician-criminal nexus, the practice of administration is stifled by the politician-bureaucrat partnership. Ironically, the civil service structure seems to have enough `enablers' and `facilitators' who help the political class.
Handling bureaucracy
Just to illustrate how difficult it is to handle the bureaucratic set up, one can review the implementation of the Expenditure Reforms Commission, set up almost a decade ago. One can still see departments of the controller-inspector raj remaining in place, merely by scanning the official telephone directory. As a matter of fact, not only is the civil service loath to transform, its members do not even seem to take kindly to attempts by the government to send them on training or refresher courses, if they are held within India. Obviously, this is what has driven the government to sign agreements with American universities, such as Harvard, to train top officials with 24-28 years of experience. Apart from perhaps the irrepressible observation about the inverse correlation between uptake and age profile of the potential trainees, is it not paradoxical that we should be pointing to China as the paradigm for development and relentless growth, but sending our bureaucrats, who should be enablers and facilitators of even faster growth than China, in the wrong direction? (The author is former Member, Ordnance Factories, Ministry of Defence.)
More Stories on : Human Resources | Politics
Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page
|
Stories in this Section |
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2007, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line
|