Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007
ePaper


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Industry & Economy - Courts/Legal Issues
States - Tamil Nadu
`Salt production on patta land subject to restriction'

Our Legal Correspondent

Chennai June 26 Salt production on patta land was subject to restrictions under Section 133 of Code of Criminal Procedure due to alleged pollution of existing water resources, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court ruled.

The petitioner (Southern Salt Manufacturing Co, Ramanathapuram) had sought permission to expand salt production on the company's patta land. The Ramanathapuram District Collector declined to grant permission, as the expansion would lead to seepage of water, which in turn would mix with water in the canal used for irrigation purposes.

Saying that this was legal, Mr Justice K. Chandru, said the District Collector was also District Magistrate, who was empowered under Section 133 of CrPc to deal with a situation of this nature.

The petitioner had applied for expansion of salt production from its patta land measuring 20 acres.

The Revenue Department objected to the same on the ground that it was likely to pollute existing water resources and also in a neighbouring area inhabited by Adi Dravidars. The Collector, after enquiry, rejected permission sought by petitioner. The petitioner contended that first respondent (Collector) had no jurisdiction to pass order, especially when he was armed with order of the Union Government. Collector had not spelt out power vested in him, and petitioner was not issued any notice.

According to the Judge, even though petitioner, under liberalisation scheme, need not have any licence and it was enough to have registration as salt unit, the order dated 29-7-2006 of Salt Factory Officer said clearly that expansion was objected to by Revenue Dept. The powers under Section 133 of CrPC did not contemplate any prior enquiry, and therefore, there was no infirmity in the said order of Collector, Judge ruled.

Dismissing writ petition, Judge said if petitioner had any material to satisfy that there was no legality in Collector's order, petitioner could always represent to Collector. The Collector would examine it and pass appropriate orders.

More Stories on : Courts/Legal Issues | Chemicals | Tamil Nadu

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Cardamom plants hit by rains, gale


PTC in evacuation deal with Videocon power project
Kerala to have 2 pvt wind power units
`Salt production on patta land subject to restriction'
`Singapore keen to explore Karnataka's potential'
Assam woos Thailand investors
Deaths due to malaria on the rise
Citigroup picks up 30% stake in Ind Barath Infra
Bengal, Sikkim ink pact on hydro project
TNEB lines up 2,500 MW projects
Hunger strike in Sikkim continues as talks fail
Net direct tax collections up
Consortium partners of Chhattisgarh Captive Coal resolve differences
ICFAI tapping demand for MBAs in non-metros
Godrej Planet setting a mark in high-rise
Companies cashing in on the realty boom
Real estate sector booming in Coimbatore
NGO plans markets for products made by self-help groups
International pharma meet from today
STC floats tender to import 10 l tonnes wheat
Centre assures steps to curb illegal areca import


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line