Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Tuesday, Nov 06, 2007
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Tuesday, Nov 06, 2007 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Info-Tech
-
Interview COAI action on spectrum unwarranted: Anil Ambani Mr Anil Ambani, Chairman of Reliance Communications, said that the move of existing GSM players will curb competition, reports CNBC-TV18. He added that the action of Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) on spectrum issue was unwarranted. Excerpts from CNBC-TV18’s interview with Mr Anil Ambani: What is your take on the entire spectrum issue? The COAI action is not representative of the Indian mobile industry. There are eight or nine players, who operate on the mobility platform. Initially, five companies out of nine took the matter to the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal. I believe two of them have already withdrawn from the case and only three are left in this matter. So, clearly we have disassociated; being a member of COAI and a GSM operator in eight circles. Others have also realised that this was an unwarranted, unnecessary and misguided action by COAI, against the future of competition and the future of the consumer. There has been a lot of controversy around your going into GSM and getting spectrum over the other operators. What is your take on the regulation and how do you think it should pan out? When you look at the propaganda by COAI, the reality is something that they do not want to recognise. The reality is that the licences are technology neutral, they were upheld by TRAI and recommended to DoT. We were issued permission to operate on both the platforms and we have paid a fee of more than Rs 1,650 crore. Our spectrum eligibility date, which has been misrepresented by certain parties, is October 19, 2007. It is unnecessary, unwarranted and misleading propaganda. Do you think that the implications could derail your GSM plan? We respect the judiciary process and see absolutely no reason. The entire approach of two-three players left in this petition, is to ensure that there is no new competition in the GSM space and stall any further stronger players from coming into this business. If you look at what some of these players have done and practised in the last three-six months, it is a visible sign of price fixation. They keep increasing their tariffs and changing their service cost parameters. I think this is anti-consumer from their perspective. What is the course of action you are going to take? We have no course of action. More Stories on : Interview | Telecommunications
Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page
|
Stories in this Section |
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2007, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line
|