Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Monday, Apr 21, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Industry & Economy - Taxation
States - Tamil Nadu
HC clears I-T Dept move to reopen assessment

Our Legal Correspondent

Chennai, April 20

The Madras High Court has ruled that there was no illegality or irregularity in the order dated May 22, 2007 of the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle II(5), issued to Fire Challenger, Chennai to reopen the assessment order for 1998-99 on the ground that inclusion of bad debt account was “clearly impermissible”.

Even though the petitioner firm was a partnership, as the certificate issued by the auditors had shown that there was a prevailing dispute referable to the Court, inclusion of the bad debt account was not permissible, and notice was issued for reopening the assessment and no exception could be taken to it, Mr Justice K. Chandru held.

The petitioner had contended that there had been gross violation of laws and legal principles by the authorities and the power of the Appellate Commissioner under Section 246(a) of the Income-tax Act was also restricted.

The respondent (Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) said in the proceedings dated February 22, 2007 that the assessee had filed return of income for 1998-99, declaring loss of Rs 50,25,668. The assessee had claimed bad debts of Rs 2.66 crore. The partner of the petitioner-firm had said that the Uttar Pradesh Government had paid less against the total sale price. According to the partner, arbitration was currently on between the firm and the UP government. The respondent said that in the circumstances, it was considered expedient to keep the matter alive by reopening assessment under section 148.

The Judge ruled that when documents were sought relating to the firm’s claim of bad debts they had not been furnished. Hence the amount had not become irrecoverable as provided in statute. There was no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order of the respondent. Hence, the writ petition would stand dismissed.

More Stories on : Taxation | Courts/Legal Issues | Tamil Nadu

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Cement cos’ energy consumption seen falling


‘Selective credit control can rein in inflation’
Call to exploit opportunities in neighbouring countries
No cement export ban on supplies to SEZ units
Tata Motors trebling captive power generation at Pune plant
Consumer durable firms feel the heat of rising steel costs
HC clears I-T Dept move to reopen assessment
Joyalukkas plans to go in for IPO to fund expansion
Skyline Builders’ sales touch Rs 250 crore
Foreign equity infusion in Hero’s single brand retail venture okayed
Iron ore exporters may face Rs 4,600 cr extra duty burden
Palanquin unveils tourist packages


Smartbuy



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line