Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Thursday, May 01, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Home Page - Textiles
Info-Tech - Courts/Legal Issues
Get Latest Quote
Supreme Court asks Tata Tele, RCom to pay Rs 700 cr to BSNL

Says access deficit charges applicable to limited mobile

Our Bureau

New Delhi, April 30 In a blow to Tata Teleservices and Reliance Communications, the Supreme Court has asked the two companies to pay up Rs 700 crore to Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd as access deficit charges on limited mobile phones.

The two companies had argued that since limited mobile phones were being provided under the fixed line telephone licence, they were not liable to pay the charges to BSNL.

However, the apex court has upheld the order given by the telecom tribunal in 2005 that limited mobile phones could not be treated as fixed line phones and is a wireless mobile service and, therefore, the companies will have to pay the charges.

Though ADC has been abolished now, in 2005 the Government had said that fixed line service providers need not pay the charges. Following the court’s order, the two companies have to pay the outstanding charges to BSNL for the past few years. ADC was a levy imposed on private operators for funding BSNL’s rural telephone schemes.

A bench headed by Mr Justice H. S. Kapadia dismissed Tata Teleservices and Reliance Communications’ petitions challenging the Telecom Dispute Settlement and Appellate Tribunal’s order, which held that its fixed wireless telephone was equivalent to mobile service and thus Reliance was liable to pay ADC of over Rs 400 crore. The Tatas will have to cough up Rs 300 crore.

“We are yet to receive a copy of the said court order and await the same. As the matter involves the Supreme Court, we would not like to comment further until we receive this order and study it at length,” a spokesperson for Tata Teleservices Ltd said.

Reliance Communications said that the ruling will not put any additional burden on the company. “The case pertains to the period 2002-03, prior to the reorganisation of Reliance Communications and has been fully provided for in the previous fiscals. There is no additional liability on the company following the judgment,” a company spokesperson said.

Related Stories:
THE ADC SWITCH
TRAI mulls lower mobile charges for rural areas

More Stories on : Textiles | Courts/Legal Issues | Reliance Communications Ltd

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Clasic Hiring

Stories in this Section
Export tax weakens basmati rice stocks


‘EPF money will not be invested in equities’
Infosys sees good scope for Platform BPO
Govt to release monthly inflation data
Sharp depreciation in rupee
Crop loss due to pest attack pegged at Rs 1.40 lakh cr
Public sector oil marketing companies facing cash crunch
Air fares go up on turbine fuel price rise
Supreme Court asks Tata Tele, RCom to pay Rs 700 cr to BSNL
Higher interest income buoys HDFC Q4 net
Reliance Comm net rises 47% on business growth
Will REMFs deliver?
‘Private equity business to maintain its growth in India’
Ads on trains catching up
Trent buys out Landmark promoter


Smartbuy



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line