Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Wednesday, May 07, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Corporate - Courts/Legal Issues
States - Tamil Nadu
HC ruling on termination of service

Our Legal Correspondent

Chennai, May 5 The Madras High Court has concurred with the order of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, that the decision of the management of a firm to terminate the service of the petitioner on the ground of his post being not required for the purpose of employer’s business could not be found fault with.

Also, the Court held that the main contention of the petitioner who challenged the order of Labour Court that when he was retrenched, no compensation was offered to him on the same day could not be accepted as when the letter of retrenchment was served on him, a cheque towards compensation was also forwarded, but he refused to receive the same.

The said cheque was subsequently sent to him.

The Labour Court, where a dispute was raised by the petitioner, had said that on January 10, 1994 when the workman was served with a letter of retrenchment along with the cheque, he refused to receive the same, and subsequently, the cheque was sent to him.

The petitioner had contended that though the letter came to him by post, that cover did not contain the cheque, and only after his request, cheque was later sent to him.

On this ground, the petitioner wanted the award to be set aside. Mr Justice K. Chandru, who dismissed the petition from Mr R. Devakumar, who was retrenched by the management of Iyyappan Engineering Industries, Ambattur, did not agree with the contention of the petitioner that no reason was given for the retrenchment.

Under Rule 61 of TN Industrial Disputes Rules, read with Form ‘R’ prescribed under Section 25-F© of Industrial Disputes Act, employer was required to furnish reason with copy marked to the appropriate Government.

The apex court had ruled that such a condition was not a condition precedent so as to nullify retrenchment itself [AIR 1964 (1) LLJ 351 (Bombay Union of Journalists vs State of Bombay].

The Judge directed the management of the firm to return the cheque to the petitioner, which was already sent to him, with necessary validation.

More Stories on : Courts/Legal Issues | Trade & Labour Unions | Tamil Nadu

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
REL to trade as Reliance Infrastructure from May 16


Accounting: ‘India could serve as hub for global corporations’
HC orders status quo on Reliance, RNRL dispute
Hinduja Foundries to pay dividend first time in 10 yrs
Mahindra Lifespace bags Nagpur housing project
Unity Infra gets Rs 223 cr orders
HC ruling on termination of service
Haldia Petro buys out L&T stake in HPL Cogen
Bharti may see burden in balance sheet
BASF setting up engineering plastic plant in Thane
New luxury hotel in Mangalore
L&T Electricals opens switchboard unit in Saudi
PowerGrid to tap biz opportunities abroad
Intas Bio plans Filgrastim launch in N. America, Europe
BHEL's Fire Service Day celebrations
Hero Group to go solo for realty biz
2 new GMs at Bharat Electronics


Smartbuy



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line