Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Wednesday, May 07, 2008 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
-
Courts/Legal Issues States - Tamil Nadu HC ruling on termination of service Our Legal Correspondent Chennai, May 5 The Madras High Court has concurred with the order of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, that the decision of the management of a firm to terminate the service of the petitioner on the ground of his post being not required for the purpose of employer’s business could not be found fault with. Also, the Court held that the main contention of the petitioner who challenged the order of Labour Court that when he was retrenched, no compensation was offered to him on the same day could not be accepted as when the letter of retrenchment was served on him, a cheque towards compensation was also forwarded, but he refused to receive the same. The said cheque was subsequently sent to him. The Labour Court, where a dispute was raised by the petitioner, had said that on January 10, 1994 when the workman was served with a letter of retrenchment along with the cheque, he refused to receive the same, and subsequently, the cheque was sent to him. The petitioner had contended that though the letter came to him by post, that cover did not contain the cheque, and only after his request, cheque was later sent to him. On this ground, the petitioner wanted the award to be set aside. Mr Justice K. Chandru, who dismissed the petition from Mr R. Devakumar, who was retrenched by the management of Iyyappan Engineering Industries, Ambattur, did not agree with the contention of the petitioner that no reason was given for the retrenchment. Under Rule 61 of TN Industrial Disputes Rules, read with Form ‘R’ prescribed under Section 25-F© of Industrial Disputes Act, employer was required to furnish reason with copy marked to the appropriate Government. The apex court had ruled that such a condition was not a condition precedent so as to nullify retrenchment itself [AIR 1964 (1) LLJ 351 (Bombay Union of Journalists vs State of Bombay]. The Judge directed the management of the firm to return the cheque to the petitioner, which was already sent to him, with necessary validation. More Stories on : Courts/Legal Issues | Trade & Labour Unions | Tamil Nadu
Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page
|
Stories in this Section |
![]() |
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2008, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line
|