Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Saturday, Jul 12, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Agri-Biz & Commodities - Rubber
Corporate - Trade & Labour Unions
States - Tamil Nadu
Doing away with wages for rest day unwarranted, says HC

Our Legal Correspondent

Chennai, July 11 Arasu Rubber Corporation Ltd, a Tamil Nadu Government venture, has been directed by the Madras High Court to implement the award of the Industrial Tribunal granting wages to workmen for the rest day.

The management’s decision to do away with the privilege was unwarranted, the court held.

Mr Justice K. Chandru, who heard the corporation challenging the awards of the tribunal holding that the wages for the rest day of certain categories of workers were valid, observed that since the category of these workmen — watchers, sweepers and scavengers — was only a vanishing tribe, the management need not have ventured into withdrawal of said privileges at the behest of other workmen.

The comparison with the private estates in and around Kanyakumari district had no relevance and in law, only the comparables could alone be compared.

Also, the reference by the management to the Plantations Labour Act and the Minimum Wages Act had no relevance in deciding the issue, the judge ruled.

The Government, which was manning the plantations before the corporation came into being, by taking note of work done by the three categories of workmen, had consciously provided rest day wages for them.

Unless there was any change of circumstances, the question of withdrawal of the said benefit did not arise.

The petitioner contended, inter alia, that the rest day wage was not a service condition between the management and workmen, and it was a concession given erroneously by the Government.

There could not be different service conditions in respect of plantation workers — one receiving rest day wage and the other not receiving such a privilege.

The tribunal held that the withdrawal of the benefit was illegal.

The writ petition was dismissed.

More Stories on : Rubber | Trade & Labour Unions | Courts/Legal Issues | Tamil Nadu

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Commodity exchanges Q1 turnover up 24%


Reliance Money to pick up stake in NMCE
Disquiet in South drains rain surplus to 10%
TN varsity cell study shows supply crunch in maize
Cotton acreage drops 38% on extended dry spell
Deadline for boat registration
Source of livelihood
Scope for seafood units
Inflation rise continues, touches 11.89%
OECD indicators signal intensified slowdown
HC allows export of 2,000 tonnes maize
Surplus potato stock: Bengal looks to southern markets
Doing away with wages for rest day unwarranted, says HC
Spot rubber prices recover
Tea auction prices up Rs 16.41 a kg in April-May
$2 m tea export order from Russia
NSL Cotton Corpn moots integrated project
Coir village to come up in Sivaganga
Investor interest in uranium increasing
‘Non-farm text is in conflict with Third World interests’
Vidarbha farmers learn ‘art of living’


Life



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line