Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Thursday, Aug 07, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Industry & Economy - Gender
States - Tamil Nadu
Law does not restrict maternity benefit to female workers to 2 deliveries: HC

Our Legal Correspondent

Chennai, Aug. 6 There was no provision in the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 on number of deliveries made by a female worker so as to entitle them for the maternity benefits. So long as Article 42 of the Constitution read with the M.B. Act, was available, every female worker was entitled to claim maternity benefits without any ceiling on number of deliveries, the Madras High Court has held.

The Inspector of Labour (Women), under Maternity Benefit Act, Tirunelveli, on receipt of complaints from two female workers of a beedi factory, that they were denied maternity benefits, ordered on 31-3-1997 and 16-5-2007 payment of Rs 2,880 and Rs 2,071 as compensation.

The petitioners (beedi factory owners) filed appeals challenging the orders of the Inspector of Labour.

Mr. Justice K. Chandru ruled that it would be a useless formality to hear the appeals because the petitioners had no credible defence in denying maternity relief to the two respondents. The allegation made by the respondents before the appellate authority that undertakings had been taken from female workers that they would not claim any maternity benefit beyond two deliveries, was a serious one, and if proved, the petitioners were liable for prosecution under the M.B. Act read with Beedi and Cigar Act, 1966.

There was no provision under the M.B. Act fixing any ceiling on number of deliveries made by a female worker. So long as Article 42 of the Constitution read with the M.B. Act was available, every female worker was entitled to claim maternity benefits without any ceiling on number of deliveries, the judge ruled, citing a judgment of the Supreme Court [B. Shah v Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore [1977 (4) SCC 384]

The writ petitions were, therefore, dismissed.

More Stories on : Gender | Courts/Legal Issues | Health | Tamil Nadu

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page


Stories in this Section
‘India’s economic development luring NRI investments’


Sentiment turns positive for cement stocks
Fears on overheating of economy allayed
Net direct tax collections up 47% in April-July
DGFT provides relief to capital goods industry
Miniratna status for Hind Copper
No mention of gas supply in scheme: Reliance
Power projects in for cost squeeze
Coal shortage: CIL finds fault with power sector
Revenues push Tata Steel higher on Fortune list; no plans to list holding company
Small units seek relaxation in power holiday
Liquor stocks remain steady in a shaky market
TRAI takes ESPN to court over non-compliance
AP to set up five nursing schools
‘Bengal realty prices to rise from September’
Meet discusses future of news
Law does not restrict maternity benefit to female workers to 2 deliveries: HC
Govt to contest ‘Ponni’ trademark to Malaysian firm
Bengal varsities, CII join hands for soft skills development
YSR orders speedy flood relief works


Brandline



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line