Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Wednesday, Sep 03, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Corporate - Courts/Legal Issues
States - Tamil Nadu
HC holds Singapore importer, Indian agent liable to clear dues to leather machinery exporter

Our Legal Correspondent

Chennai, Sept. 2 The Madras High Court has ruled that Section 230 of the Indian Contract Act embodied the principle of English Law relating to the personal liability of the agent of a foreign principal; it was, however, confined only to cases of a contract by an agent for sale/purchase for a merchant resident abroad.

Setting aside the orders of two lower courts (IV Addl City Court & IV Asst City Court, Chennai), which had held that it had not been proved by a Chennai-based company (Skandia Sales & Services P Ltd) that the second respondent (Mr T.R. Srinivasan) had acted as the agent of the first respondent (Bovine Leathers P Ltd, Singapore), Mr Justice K.K. Sridharan ruled that the substantial questions of law were answered in favour of the appellant (Skandia Sales).

In view of the purchase order and other surrounding circumstances projected by the appellant, the judge said, both the lower courts ‘miserably’ failed in their conclusion regarding the rule of the second respondent in the transaction.

The appellant contended that R2, describing himself as agent of R1, approached them for supply of leather processing machinery. R2 assured that R1 would effect the payment immediately on receipt of the machinery. The appellant shipped the machinery, which was also received by R1 at Singapore. When the bills were submitted to R1, they were not honoured. The appellant filed the suit for recovery of the bill amount.

The judge said that the pleadings and evidence clearly showed the involvement of R2 in the transaction. Citing the judgment of a Division Bench of this court (Gnanasundara v Berton Export Co – AIR 1964 Madras 113), the judge held that the English Law had stuck to the view that an agent of a foreign principal was presumed to be personally liable till the contrary was proved.

The judgment and decree of the lower courts were set aside and the suit was decreed making both respondents jointly and severally liable to discharge the suits claim to the appellant with interest.

More Stories on : Courts/Legal Issues | Engineering | Exports & Imports | Tamil Nadu

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page




Stories in this Section
Maruti to scale up R&D work on small car engines


Kingfisher flying overseas today
Tata Motors’ ‘A’ rights priced Rs 305 a share
Gas row: RNRL willing to place family MoU in court
Small units may have it easy with new cos Act
Lanco Aban gets CII award
HC holds Singapore importer, Indian agent liable to clear dues to leather machinery exporter
Convergys mulls biz rejig
A K Minda Group buys German co
NTPC-BHEL to sell 50% stake
Nano vendors hold on to the dream
Tata Motors gearing up to pull out from Singur
Troubled ride
Sical Logistics to finalise location for Jurong Port joint venture in 3 months
Archies bonds with UK co to retail ‘Me to You’ product range
Ambuja Cement output up in Aug
ONGC not keen on higher stake for Statoil
Apollo Reach plans big for small cities, towns
Dr Reddy’s scouting for buys
Nivio to raise $12-15 m to fund growth
Airbus expects next wave of orders in 2011-12
General Motors India looking to export vehicles
OIL to invest Rs 13,000 cr in 5 years, mulls IPO in Nov
GM India to launch second small car in 2009


Smartbuy



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line