Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Tuesday, Nov 11, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio | Blogs

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Industry & Economy - Real Estate & Construction
FIPB rejects Keppel proposal to sell 1.5 acres unused land back to Puravankara Projects

Moumita Bakshi Chatterjee

New Delhi, Nov. 10

The Foreign Investment Promotion Board has rejected a proposal by Keppel Puravankara Development (KPDL), Bangalore, to sell the 1.5 acre unused land back to Puravankara Projects Ltd, as FDI norms do not permit sale of undeveloped plots.

Joint venture

KPDL is a joint venture between the Singapore-based Keppel Land and Indian firm Puravankara Projects Ltd for development of integrated township projects in Bangalore. KPDL had acquired certain vacant plots (including the 1.5 acres plot) with the view to undertaking construction and housing project on a parcel of 62 acres, sources said.

The project, however, did not materialise, and since KPDL cannot use a small portion of land for any FDI-compliant project, the company proposed to sell the ‘unused’ land of 1.5 acres at the current price.

Keppel Land, through its subsidiaries, holds 51 per cent of equity share capital in KPDL with the remaining 49 per cent being held by Puravankara.

Sources said that KPDL had stated that the proposed sale of the ‘undeveloped land’ of 1.5 acres at cost would not qualify as a real estate transaction as it did not involve any real estate motive.

Unused land

“KPDL has proposed to sell the unused land at the cost at which it has acquired from Puravankara Projects (inclusive of all charges), back to PPL. The company said that this demonstrated the absence of any real estate motive or nature in the context of the proposed sale of transaction,” sources said.

Sources pointed out that the land was proposed to be sold back to PPL at cost at which it was purchased or at the market price. The proposal did not involve any fresh FDI inflow.

The matter came up for discussion at the FIPB meeting in October end where the Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion (DIPP) did not support it on the ground that Press Note 2 (2005) does not permit sale of undeveloped plots.

The FIPB noted that FDI in real estate is prohibited and that purchase or sale of land would be categorised as a real estate activity. The companies could not be reached for comments.

More Stories on : Real Estate & Construction | Foreign Direct Investment

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page




Stories in this Section
Auto numbers down in Oct, confirms SIAM report


Combating the present crisis
‘Immediate slowdown in US outsourcing to India unlikely’
‘India high on US growth agenda’
Regulator to review TPAs’ performance
Murugappa group plans infrastructure biz entry
RIL arm may take 67% stake in KG Gas Network
KSEB signs pact with Neyveli Lignite
Private power will be costly, says CII
Narayana Hrudayalaya makes investment plans
TDI plans Rs 350-cr logistics park in Kundli
FIPB rejects Keppel proposal to sell 1.5 acres unused land back to Puravankara Projects
Chandrayaan a day away from home
Uncertainty hits Karnataka mining belt
Iron ore duty cut: Chinese demand more critical
More investment queries from US
GPS-related venture with Chinese partners blocked
AP to reduce palm oil price for white card holders
Gujarat Govt road show today
Delhi to host franchise event
Liquidity crunch may open door for ‘Hawala’ traffic: Modi




eWorld



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line