Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Friday, Jan 09, 2009
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio | Blogs

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Industry & Economy - Social Security
States - Tamil Nadu
HC sets guideline for dealing with gratuity cases

Our Legal Correspondent

Chennai, Jan. 8 Proceedings for payment of gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, must be taken up under that law and not under any other Act, Madras High Court has ruled.

When a special law created a right as well as remedy, the litigant must be directed to go before that forum and not any other body, the First Bench held.

Setting aside an order dated November 2, 2006, of the single judge ruling that any person unsatisfied with disbursement of gratuity should find solution only under the provisions of Co-operative Societies Act, and could not go before authorities under Gratuity Act, the Bench comprising Chief Justice A.K. Ganguly, as he then was, and Mr Justice K. Chandru held that the argument of the Special Officer, Kanyakumari Dist Central Co-op Bank, Nagercoil, that the Co-op Societies Act was the self-contained law for the petitioner (K. Ambalanatha Doss, employee of the Kanyakumari Co-op Bank) could not be accepted.

The bank, the Bench noted, instead of participating before the controlling authority under the Gratuity Act (Asst Labour Commissioner, Tirunelveli) filed a writ petition before this Court making a strange prayer. The plea of the bank was that the Assistant Labour Commissioner should be directed to return the gratuity application of the appellant in the gratuity case. If for any reason the bank felt that the assistant commissioner was lacking jurisdiction, even the question of lack of jurisdiction could be raised before the statutory authority instead of rushing to this Court, the Bench ruled.

The single judge said, inter alia, the Assistant Labour Commissioner was at liberty to approach the Registrar of Co-op Societies under Section 153 of Societies Act. The Bench referred to a decision of Supreme Court (State of Punjab vs Labour Court, Jullundur – AIR 1979 SC 1981) and said that the application filed by the employee (appellant) under Section 33-C(2) of the ID Act did not lie.

While setting aside the single judge’s order, the Bench ruled that the proceedings before Assistant Labour Commissioner in gratuity case would stand restored.

More Stories on : Social Security | Courts/Legal Issues | Tamil Nadu

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page




Stories in this Section
‘Sense of urgency should guide in building of knowledge network’


Nod soon for overseas Indian professionals to practise here
Meeting health, education needs key to growth: Sam Pitroda
Fight corruption, Prahalad tells Indian diaspora
Gujarat invites investment in wind power sector
HC sets guideline for dealing with gratuity cases
US law firms file ‘class-action’ suits against Satyam
‘Machine tool sector needs stronger R&D support’
AP Govt backing for health initiatives tied to Satyam
Conference organisers pick cheaper venues than India
Infrastructure cos eye education space to tackle manpower crunch
6,000 km of road projects by March, says Montek
Fuel crisis worsens in Mumbai
No stock
HPCL outlets will continue to meet part of demand
India to sign global pact on nuclear liabilities soon: Shyam Saran
Karnataka small units seek relief package
Coimbatore industries urged to capitalise on Railway project
Coal imports growing at 17% annually
Rammohan Rao quits as ISB Dean
Mr R. Viswananthan, a freelance trainer-cum-consultant and retired deputy MD, SBI; Vivekananda College, Chennai
Call to take back land allotted to Satyam for setting up SEZ
A $50-b industry cannot be clouded by ‘misdeeds’ of a few
Apparel industry presses for relief
Smart cards for migrant Indians to be ready soon, says Vayalar Ravi
Oil executives strike starts impacting daily life
NRI remittances must go into productive investments
‘Focus now on micro-management of exporters’ specific issues’
Police, CBI waiting for formal complaint
Issue of cognisable offence being raised


Life



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2009, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line