Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Friday, Nov 06, 2009
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio | Blogs

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Corporate - Corporate Governance
Company Secretaries body for cap on directorships

Corporates must conform to governance laws.


Snapshot

Maximum number of listed cos in which an individual can serve as a director should be restricted to seven

ICSI also calls for a standard structure of the Annual Report as the disclosure requirements have increased


Our Bureau

Hyderabad, Nov. 5

The Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) has suggested that the number of directorships for an individual should be capped at 15.

The maximum number of listed companies in which an individual can serve as a director should be restricted to seven.

The ICSI, which has submitted a list of recommendations to Mr Salman Khursheed, the Union Minister for Corporate Affairs, here on Thursday said that the number should encompass the directorships in public and private companies (including holding or subsidiary firms).

The institute has also called for a maximum tenure of six years specified for independent directors.

Annual Report

“Induction training of directors should be made mandatory, covering role, responsibilities and liabilities of a director. There should be a statement to this effect by the board in the annual report,” it said in the 46-page recommendations to the Minister.

It called for a standard structure of the annual report, keeping in view the enhanced disclosure requirements. “Annual reports have become very large and unwieldy. So, the presentation of information in the annual reports should be standardised,” it said.

The institute also wanted the Government to increase the responsibility of the corporates in complying with the corporate governance laws. “Mandate constitution of Corporate Compliance Committee in all public limited companies with paid-up capital of Rs 5 crore or more,” it said.

The Directors’ Responsibility Statement should include a statement that the directors had devised proper systems to ensure compliance of all laws applicable to the company and that such systems were adequate and operating effectively.

With regard to remuneration, the institute felt that the policy should be strongly linked to the company’s performance.

It also wanted clarity on the term ‘relative’ defined under the Companies Bill, 2009. The term ‘lineal ascendants and descendants’ should be clarified by giving an indicative list.

More Stories on : Corporate Governance

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
RIL, RNRL allege contradictions in each other’s statements


Let’s not reduce this case to a street brawl: Salve
Maytas Infra bags Rs 790-cr order
Realty cos: Slow build-up in sales, even as profits deconstruct
Pledging of shares points to Suzlon’s cash woes
Wipro Consumer buys Yardley for Rs 214 cr
Company Secretaries body for cap on directorships
MRPL mandates SBI Caps to raise Rs 5,000 cr to fund projects
Ashok Hotels to come up in more cities
Coal India abandons plan to buy asset in Australia
Chittivalasa jute mill lockout continues
Honda Cars ties up with insurance cos
Premier Explosives plans solar, wind power entry
Gadgil forays into real estate
IOC chief rues uncertainty of investment return
Tatas going global with low-cost housing
Honda to launch 110cc bike with new style mantra
Renault here to stay despite challenges
PowerGrid makes top-level changes at telecom arm




The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2009, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line