• Investment World
• eWorld
• Brand Line
• Mentor
• Life
• Brand Quest
• The New Manager
• BL Club
• Smartbuy
• Books
• Gallery

Stocks

• Quotes
• SE Diary
• Scoreboard
• Open-End Mutual Fund

Cross Currency

• Rates
  
  

Shipping

• Ports
  
  

Archives

• Yesterday
• Datewise
• Resources
• In Focus
• In Depth
• Events 2007

Group Sites

• The Hindu
• The Hindu ePaper
• Business Line
• Business Line ePaper
• Sportstar
• Frontline
• The Hindu eBooks
• The Hindu Images

Our Bureau

New Delhi, Nov. 11 Even as the Centre seems to be divided over raising the floor price on basmati shipments, the All-India Rice Exporters’ Association (AIREA) has sought status quo on the issue.

“We need to de-link basmati from food security, since this is a premium rice variety not consumed by vulnerable sections of our society. Therefore, there should be no move to raise the minimum export price (MEP) at this point of time. Policy stability and continuity is important for products that are predominantly exported and where it takes years to build markets,” said Mr V.K. Arora, President of AIREA.

The Commerce Ministry had, on September 9, slashed the MEP on basmati shipments from $1,100 to $900 a tonne. Simultaneously, it also allowed for a foreign commission of 12.5 per cent for computation of the MEP.

In other words, even if a shipment is formally invoiced at $900 a tonne, the exporter can remit up to $112.5 in the form of discount/commission to the overseas buyer. Effectively then, the MEP works out to $787.5 a tonne.

But with the current year’s kharif rice output officially estimated to have declined to 69.45 million tonnes (mt), from the 84.58 mt of kharif 2008, there is renewed pressure on the Centre to restrict exports. The Food Ministry apparently has sought restoring the MEP back to the earlier $1,100 a tonne level, while the Commerce Ministry is opposed to the move.

The Commerce Secretary, Mr Rahul Khullar, was quoted by agencies as saying that “there is no case for hiking basmati MEP, as there is already a ban on exports of non-basmati rice and basmati is not consumed by the common man in India.”

The matter may come for discussion at the meeting of the Empowered Group of Ministers, scheduled for Thursday.

The country’s basmati exports amounted to 1.520 mt in 2007-08 and 2.314 mt in 2008-09, at an average price of $976 and $1,366 a tonne, respectively.

During April-September, this year, exports of 1.816 mt have been registered with the APEDA at an average value of $1,294 a tonne. Of this, actual exports are estimated to have been around 1.4 mt, with total shipments for 2009-10 expected to touch 2.8 mt.

Those favouring a higher MEP point to the average price of $1,294 a tonne at which basmati exports have been contracted so far this year. Although the average contracted price has fallen from $1,547 in April to $1,185 a tonne in September, it is still higher than the existing MEP of $900, they say.

Moreover, Thai Jasmine rice is currently quoting at $1,059 a tonne. Allowing exports at $900, therefore, puts downgrades the status of basmati as a premium rice variety. Instead, it would actually encourage illegal export of non-basmati varieties, with unscrupulous traders shipping these along with regular basmati by taking advantage of a low MEP, it is argued.

Mr Arora, however, dismissed these allegations, citing competition from Pakistan, which, by virtue of a weaker domestic currency, is exporting at prices of $600-800 a tonne.

Further, this time, the country has had a bumper basmati paddy crop of 6.5 mt, which is about 3.4 mt in head (full-grain) rice terms. “Restrictions on exports will eventually impact the farmers,” he added.

Farmers, this year, have planted an estimated 1.492 million hectares (mh) under ‘Pusa-1121’, ‘Pusa-Basmati-1’ and ‘Super’ evolved basmati varieties. This is 25 per cent more than last year’s coverage of 1.195 mh. At the same time, they have cut down the area under traditional basmati paddy, from 0.372 mh to 0.212 mh.

More Stories on : Rice | Exports & Imports | Policy

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page

Copyright © 2009, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line