Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Tuesday, Aug 24, 2004

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Corporate - Company Law


Co law norms: Ministry clarifies on who can be nailed for non-compliance

Richa Mishra

New Delhi , Aug. 23

COMPANY employees can breathe easy now. The Ministry of Company Affairs has fixed responsibility for non-compliance of certain provisions of the company law.

Hitherto, the absence of clarity on this front led to officials and employees of companies facing legal hardships.

As per the clarification, persons who are to be considered as liable for prosecution include the Managing Director or Manager as the case may be and the Company Secretary, if appointed, or a person who is in-charge for maintenance and preparation of annual accounts in compliance with the provisions.

In companies where there is no Managing Director or Manager, the entire board of directors and the Company Secretary, if appointed, would be responsible, the Ministry said.

In fact, industry sources said, this has led to all the directors, officers and other employees who were not charged with the responsibility of specific compliances to be penalised.

This was neither practical nor realistic.

The problem, according to them, was more so in cases of penal action for violation of sections pertaining to form and content of balance sheet and profit/loss accounts.

Further, the term `officer' was interpreted differently on various occasions.

Clarifying on the term `officer', the Ministry stated that only those persons from among the officers and employees other than the Managing Director, Manager and Directors who have been charged by either the Managing Director, Manager or the Board with specific responsibility of complying with the said provisions would be held responsible.

The sources said that a doubt had arisen as to whether in addition to Managing Director or Manager as the case may be, other directors, namely the Wholetime director and non-Wholetime Director or ordinary Director of an erring company were also liable for penal action. This clarification, they said, would absolve such officers and employees who are not connected with the responsibility of complying with the said provisions.

More Stories on : Company Law

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Lower prices to stay till March 2005: Tata Steel


Glenmark files for Phase I trials on asthma drug in UK
Nagarjuna Const bags 3 orders worth Rs 158.03 cr
Jetking postpones board meeting
GMR allots shares to VIL members
Lodha to dispute Birlas' claim; `property not of HUF origin'
FLAG withdraws plaint against VSNL's US foray
Co law norms: Ministry clarifies on who can be nailed for non-compliance
India Inc favours consolidated income-tax assessments
Hindalco finalises merger of Indal units with itself
Little incentive to keep Indal separate
Ashok Leyland Hosur plant staff go on strike
Max Healthcare ties up with Singapore hospital
Truckers' stir: Toyota, Honda to review situation
Bosch plans Rs 1,000-cr investment — To build common rail systems thru Mico
Voltas to break price barrier in more segments
Hitachi Home targets Rs 170-cr turnover



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2004, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line