Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Monday, Nov 21, 2005


News
Features
Stocks
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Industry & Economy - Economic Offences
Logistics - Courts/Legal Issues


Dismissal from service for taking bribe set aside

Our Legal Correspondent

Chennai , Nov. 20

TO dismiss a person from service for taking bribe would be an `extreme' punishment; at the same time, imposition of `stringent' punishment by stopping his promotion, increments etc would meet the ends of justice, the Madras High Court has ruled.

While grabbing money illegally, especially by a Government servant, was the worst disturbing feature and the offender had to be punished suitably, dismissal from service was "disproportionate for the reason that the object and thrust behind awarding of a punishment was only to mend him and not to strangulate", a Division Bench, comprising Mr Justice P. Sathasivam and Mr Justice S.K. Krishnan, held.

Setting aside the orders of the Transport Commissioner, Tamil Nadu, dismissing from service Rm Palaniappan, a motor vehicles inspector, and that of the State Administrative Tribunal confirming the sentence, the Bench pointed out that the "shameful" act committed by the offender was serious in nature. But the extreme punishment was "disproportionate" when compared with the gravity of the charge. Otherwise, the very purpose of awarding punishment would not be served.

The petitioner, who was appointed in November 1983, was served with a charge memo on November 22, 1995 by the Transport Commissioner alleging that while in service he had taken bribe. The Commissioner on June 6, 2000 passed an order dismissing him from service. The State Administrative Tribunal justified the punishment awarded to him.

The Bench further directed the authorities not to grant annual increment, DA, bonus and any other monetary benefit, and also any service benefits like promotion, etc. for five years from the date of this order. In other words, the petitioner had to go home with his monthly salary alone, i.e., what he was drawing as on date, for five years.

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page

More Stories on : Economic Offences | Courts/Legal Issues



Stories in this Section
Indo-UK climate study says India will get `warmer'


Heavy rain forecast for southern TN, Kerala
TN sugar mills to supply ethanol to oil cos from Dec
Encourage cane-based alcohol units: Expert
Journal on economic policy
India Calling 2005 to focus on ties with Gulf countries
Bajaj Allianz General policy for e-consultations abroad
Workshop for AP civic bodies leaders
Synthetic fibre industry seeks 4 pc Cenvat rate on all textile fibres
Gujarat, Maharashtra to jointly mine coal
Wine bars to become a reality in Maharashtra
1.55 lakh candidates appear for CAT
Format, content baffle students yet again
Back to the school library
Badruka College starts course in international biz
Snacks to boost demand in packaged food sector: Study
UBI to open 100 village knowledge centres
Changing face of trade unions in Kerala
SBI staff hold demonstration at Thrissur
`Print Pack and Sign Show'
Engagements
Hygiene index for eateries planned
Heritage sites as tourism products
Volcker probe: The big picture
Dismissal from service for taking bribe set aside


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2005, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line