Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Tuesday, Jun 19, 2007
ePaper


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Corporate - IPR
Glivec: Novartis objects to bench composition

Our Bureau

`Presence of former patents chief poses problem'

Mumbai June 18 Swiss drug-maker Novartis has objected to the presence of former Controller-General of Patents, Mr S. Chandrasekaran, as a Technical Member on the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB).

This was the IPAB's first hearing on the rejection of Novartis's patent application on its cancer drug, Glivec.

"The newly-appointed technical member of the appellate board is the former Controller-General of the Indian Patent Office, who was responsible for the original decision on the Glivec patent in 2006 and was acting as a party in the recent Court case reviewing the decision of the Indian Patent Office to reject our Glivec patent filing," Novartis said in a statement on Monday.

All parties to the case, including the Cancer Patients Aid Association (CPAA) and generic drug-makers like Natco, Cipla, Hetero and Ranbaxy, will now have to respond on whether indeed Mr Chandrasekaran can be on the bench hearing this case, said a patent attorney familiar with the case, which comes up for its next hearing on July 2.

At the next hearing, the two-member bench, whose other member is IPAB Chairman, Mr Justice M.H.S. Ansari, will listen to what generic companies and the CPAA, an NGO, have to say on the composition of the bench hearing this case.

Glivec is a life-saving cancer drug that has been granted patent in nearly 40 countries - including China, Russia and Taiwan, the company said, adding that the same should be the case in India.

Novartis has come under intense local and international pressure for pursuing the patent application on Glivec.

Several patient organisations say that it would put the drug beyond the reach of patients who cannot pay.

Though Novartis gives the drug free to cancer patients in India, cancer-patient organisations question the sustainability of such free programmes, besides the impact it would have on medicines in other sectors.

More Stories on : IPR | Pharmaceuticals | Regulatory Bodies & Rulings

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Cairn asked to work out appraisal programme


Tata Motors launches Winger, Magic
Taskforce likely on UK, India corporate issues
Foreign currency loans: IOC may save Rs 150 cr on interest
Ramsarup Industries full-year PAT up 57% at Rs 44 cr
BHEL bags Rs 139-cr NTPC order
JSPL bags eco award
The importance of succession planning
Glivec: Novartis objects to bench composition
IT, ITeS corner lion's share of outbound investments to US
Indian Oil-BRPL merger plan awaits Cabinet nod
SpiceJet denies in talks for stake sale
Top priority for environmental clearances, says JSW Steel
IT & BPO sector notches up $860 m in M&A deals
JBM Auto enters joint venture with Japan cos
TCG partners with Forest for drug candidates
Anil Ambani group pitches for transparent norms for Reliance's K-G gas pricing
Adroit plans luxury apartments in Chennai
Brigade Hospitality plans Rs 1,000-cr hotel projects
Tata motors plans to make Ace range in Uttarakhand
Gulf Oil's arm may see management changes


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line