Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Saturday, Oct 13, 2007
ePaper


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Corporate - Corporate Disputes
Birla estate: Lodha appeal upheld

Order appointing 4 administrators set aside by HC

Our Legal Correspondent

Kolkata, Oct 12

A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court comprising Mr Justice P.C. Ghose and Mr Justice T.K. Dutt has set aside the order of the trial court which appointed four administrators over the estate of M.P. Birla.

The Bench, while allowing the appeals filed by R.S. Lodha, the sole executor of the last Will of late Priyamvada Devi Birla, wife of late M.P. Birla, however, restrained R.S. Lodha from disposing of and/or transferring the assets of M.P. Birla estate.

The court directed Mr Lodha to furnish statement of dividend to all the contesting parties.

He was further directed to keep the dividend amount in a separate bank account. Mr Lodha was also restrained from using the funds of M.P. Birla Estate except that which is required for preservation of the estate.

The Bench, in its 155 pages order, observed that in view of the undertaking given by counsel of Lodha before the Trial Court, there is no necessity to look after the estate of M.P. Birla.

On May 19, 2006, the Trial Court had passed the order with regard to appointment of four administrators over the M.P. Birla estate, and on the same day Mr Lodha moved an appeal and obtained an interim stay of the order.

The Appeal Court today finally set aside the Trial Court order.

After the demise of Priyamvada Birla on July 2004, the four Birlas, namely, Mr G.P. Birla, Mr K.K. Birla, Mr B.K. Birla and Mr Yashovardhan Birla along with Ms Laxmi Newar and Ms Radha Mohta, the two sisters of M.P. Birla, filed application for appointment of administrators over the estate of M.P. Birla in the Trial Court.

In the mean time, Mr Lodha challenged the caveatable interest of the four Birlas, who filed caveats against Lodha’s Probate petition.

The Calcutta High Court held that only G.P. Birla had caveatable interest and not the others.

The Birlas challenged the order in the Supreme Court, where the matter is now being heard.

More Stories on : Corporate Disputes | Courts/Legal Issues

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Philips to showcase pre-clinical tool


Reliance won’t associate its name with non-veg
Lupin gets €20 m in patent sale deal
BPCL diesel exports to Bangladesh from Numaligarh yet to take off
Tata Motors launches new Sumo, Safari range
Canoro plans more wells in Amguri field
Birla estate: Lodha appeal upheld
Award for Antrix chief
Court ruling on levy of interest on excise duty
‘HR, the differentiator between organisations’
ACC hikes stake in Shiva Cement to 14.7%
ONGC arm invites cos to set up downstream units
Reliance may use ‘marketable securities’ for expansion: Mukesh
Apollo Tyres relocates Kochi facility
Himatsingka facility goes on stream
Titan Energy plans Rs 900-cr solar cell plant
Panasonic, MCC group tie up
SAIL body pact with IIM Indore
ONGC-Mehsana Asset programme for girl child welfare
Oil India may file IPO papers by mid-Nov
Bentley sees its market doubling in India
Hero Honda banking on festive season to revive sales


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line