Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Tuesday, Oct 16, 2007
ePaper

Clasic Farm

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Home Page - Real Estate & Construction
Industry & Economy - Taxation
Injunction against service tax on rent of commercial buildings

Our Bureau

Chennai, Oct. 15 The Madras High Court has granted an interim injunction restraining the Union Finance Ministry from collecting service tax on rent of commercial buildings following a petition filed by General Star Kitchen Pvt Ltd, which operates a restaurant in Chennai Citi Centre.

In the order dated October 9, the court has granted two weeks injunction. The case has been posted for hearing on October 22.

The order has evoked the interest of developers and landlords who have been affected by the Union budget levying 12 per cent service tax on rent or lease of commercial space. Those particularly affected are the owners who have leased space to retailers and information technology companies, say real estate developers.

While the manufacturing sector is able to treat the tax as input credit and pass it on, the retailers and other service providers find the new tax eating into their margins, they say.

The petitioner has challenged the levy of service tax on the grounds that the Union Government has no power to levy any tax on rentals accruing from building in the form of service tax or otherwise. Such a levy is a tax on rent, which in turn is a tax on property. Under the Constitution, only the State Government has the exclusive power to levy tax on land and building.

The petitioner has also submitted that there is no service involved in letting out immovable properties. The Union Government is attempting to levy a tax on service, which it is not entitled to under the federal framework of the Constitution.

The petitioner has also argued that the Government has drawn a distinction between letting properties to business or commerce, on which the service tax is levied, and other leases. There is no distinction between the landlord who lets out property for a commercial purpose or otherwise. So, the distinction is hostile and discriminatory and violates the fundamental right of equality under law.

Related Stories:
Commercial space may cost 12% more

More Stories on : Real Estate & Construction | Taxation | Courts/Legal Issues | Budget

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



PNB Hiring

Stories in this Section
RIL-RNRL dispute: Prolonged uncertainty


DoT may freeze spectrum per operator
Diversified equity funds outperform gold ETFs
Ambanis’ accord binding on group cos: HC
Today's Pick: ING Vysya Bank (Rs 264.05)
Day Trading Guide
TCS clocks 22.8% rise in Q2 net on better margins
Sasken posts higher net on broad-based growth
Bomb threat to BSE, NSE
Taiwan’s SYM looking to make India an export hub
Injunction against service tax on rent of commercial buildings
TCS staff strength crosses 1 lakh
Lower landed cost may favour crude palm oil import
Bull charge lifts Sensex 639 points to top 19,000
FII buying lifts metal stocks
Cerebra Integrated Tech
IFCI giving option for converting debt into equity
Tsunami early warning centre dedicated to nation


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line