|
|
Markets
-
Interview
Web Extras
-
Foreign Institutional Investors
Participatory note policy driven by a short-term view of market
D. Murali
The proposed policy changes
about PNs (participatory
notes) seem to be a reflex action
in an attempt to contain
the inflow and thereby the
Sensex that seems to be gaining
momentum of a runaway
train, says Mr Vipul R. Jhaveri,
Partner-Direct Tax in Deloitte,
Haskins & Sells,
Mumbai.
The proposal of the market
regulator SEBI (Securities
and Exchange Board of India),
as you would remember,
triggered an immediate reaction
in the market, causing a
big fall in the indices in the
opening session, and trading
had to be suspended for an
hour. The Finance Minister
had to quickly make a statement
to pacify the market
sentiments, and he has since
then been, in response to high
volatility in the bourses.
"While SEBI's objective of
protecting the investors and
preventing speculative trading
by offshore investors is
desirable and well intended,
the real question is whether
SEBI's assessment is right -
that the current unabated rise
in the stock market is speculative
in nature and if so, the
ODIs are the cause," Mr Jhaveri
asks, during the course of
an e-mail interaction with
Business Line.
An error in assessment
could prove counter productive
and instead cause a flight
of capital from the country,
and the solution may well be
worse than the problem, he
fears.
"Further, subsequent backtracking
and Ministerial
statements would demonstrate
system weakness and
encourage speculation."
Mr Jhaveri is of the view
that SEBI should perhaps
have taken a closer look at the
reporting requirements and
KYC (know your client)
norms and strengthened
them with a view to gather adequate
information on the antecedents
of the subscribers /
investors of ODI (offshore derivative
instrument) and improve
its visibility with regard
to them.
"It seems that SEBI's reaction
is driven by the shortterm
view of the market and
not recognising the fact that
consistent flow of investment
is critical of the healthy
growth of any capital market,"
he postulates.
"SEBI should consider having
the above restrictions only
for a particular period of time
till adequate system is implemented
to seek and scrutinise
required information from
the foreign institutional investor
(FII) or sub-accounts
before issuance of ODIs."
For starters, Mr Jhaveri answers
a few questions.
Excerpts.
What are PNs?
PNs or participatory notes
are derivative instruments issued
by SEBI-registered FIIs
against underlying Indian securities
held by them. An FII
may collect funds from various
unregistered foreign investors,
pool the funds against
underlying Indian securities,
issue PNs to such investors
and provide a return on the
PNs linked to equity index.
The FII may buy or sell Indian
securities, on its proprietary
account, on behalf of
foreign investors not registered
in India for trading in
the domestic market. PNs in a
sense are extra-territorial
instruments.
How are these instruments regulated?
SEBI Regulation 15A inserted
on February 3, 2004
regulates the issuance of PNs.
This regulation speaks of two
points:
One, FII can issue ODIs, as
for example PNs, against underlying
Indian securities only
to entities that are
regulated by any relevant regulatory
authorities in the
countries of their incorporation.
Further, the FII shall ensure
that no further down
stream issue or transfer of
such ODIs is made to any person
other than a regulated
entity.
Secondly, the ODI issue can
be made subject to compliance
with KYC requirement.
How is all this monitored?
Investment through PNs is
monitored by SEBI by prescribing
reporting requirements
on the FIIs viz.
a) Any FII or its sub-account
which issues/renews/
cancels/redeems PNs is required
to report to SEBI on a
monthly basis.
b) FIIs/sub-accounts
merely investing/subscribing
in/to the PNs/access products/
ODIs or any such type of
instruments/securities with
underlying Indian market securities
are required to report
on a quarterly basis.
Who is permitted to issue PNs?
In order to regulate and monitor investments in the Indian stock market made by such unregistered foreign investors through the PN route, SEBI has specified who can subscribe to/invest in such notes. The type of foreign investors permitted to do so are:
a) Any entity incorporated in a jurisdiction that requires filing of constitutional and/or other documents with a registrar of companies or comparable regulatory agency or body under the applicable companies legislation in that jurisdiction;
b) Any entity that is regulated, authorised or supervised by a central bank or any other similar body provided that the entity must not only be authorised but also be regulated by the aforesaid regulatory bodies;
c) Any entity that is regulated, authorised or supervised by a securities or futures commission, or other securities or futures authority or commission in any country, state or territory;
d) Any entity that is a member of securities or futures exchanges or other similar self regulatory securities or futures authority or commission within any country, state or territory provided that the aforesaid organisations which are in the nature of self regulatory organisations are ultimately accountable to the respective securities / financial market regulators;
e) Any individual or entity (such as fund, trust, collective investment scheme, Investment Company or limited partnership) whose investment advisory function is managed by an entity satisfying the criteria of (a), (b), (c) or (d) above.
Aren't these checks enough?
It would appear that the investment into India through the PN route had been effectively and adequately regulated with the specification of who can issue and who can subscribe to or invest in the PNs coupled with a quarterly reporting requirement by the issuers after insertion of Regulation 15A in February 2004.
SEBI has however come out with a discussion paper on ODIs (October 16, 2007) proposing restrictions on issuance of ODI.
In the paper, SEBI has highlighted the constant increase in the issuance of ODIs, the anonymity that the ODI provides to the investors and the copious inflows into the country from foreign investors as key reasons for such policy amendments.
Mr Jhaveri has experience of more than 20 years in the field of corporate taxation, both domestic and international. He has lead large projects involving multiple service lines, structuring of transactions and operations, tax management and compliance-related services, litigation support, tax due diligence for acquisitions / privatisations, advising on tax issues for re-structuring and re-organisations of businesses etc. Mr Jhaveri services some of the largest financial services and FII clients of the firm. He has also played a key role in advising clients bidding to acquire some of the biggest privatisations offers made by the Government of India.
http://InterviewsInsights.blogspot.com
More Stories on :
Interview |
Foreign Institutional Investors |
Regulatory Bodies & Rulings |
Stock Markets
Article
E-Mail
::
Comment
::
Syndication
::
Printer Friendly Page
|
Stories in this Section
Corporate developments
LIC Housing net rises on higher interest income
Motilal Oswal launches wealth management biz
Banks seek status quo on investment categorisation
Lotus India launches AGILE fund
Sunteck gets Rs 140 cr from Kotak realty fund
Man Aluminum resumes trading
Licence acquisition – Shot in arm for RCom
Capex plans lift Prakash Ind
Bears prevail
Nifty future sees 36% rollovers
Sub-accounts get 1 week to register as FIIs
Sensex gains 54 points
Managing foreign fund inflows a challenge: Kamath
Warburg Pincus to pick 11.2% in Havells India for $110 m
Post SEBI clarification: Unwinding by some likely
SEBI clarifications clear the air
Participatory note policy driven by a short-term view of market
Today's Pick: Dena Bank (Rs 53.4)
Day Trading Guide
Ashco Industries makes debut
Gold ETFs top performance charts
|
|