Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Wednesday, Oct 24, 2007
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Corporate - Corporate Governance
Corporate governance: Survey lists pros and cons of family owned cos

Our Bureau

Mumbai, Oct. 23 Family-owned companies dominate India’s corporate landscape, according to a new joint survey on Indian corporate governance by Moody’s Investors Service and ICRA Ltd. Such firms have specific characteristics compared to companies with more widespread share ownership.

The survey covered certain corporate governance practices of 32 Indian companies in 16 prominent family groups, covering a broad cross-section of Indian industry.

Positive characteristics of family control can include a long-term perspective and an ability to act quickly; and Indian family companies have responded well to the opportunities available in the fast growing and liberalising economy.

Concern

However, family control can also raise specific corporate governance concerns – with potentially negative credit implications – that include adaptability, leadership transition, checks and balances, and transparency, says the report.

“Although Indian corporate governance practices are improving, this largely reflects regulation of listed companies, particularly regarding ’checks and balances’ such as composition of the board of directors and the operations of audit committees,” says Mr Chetan Modi, Moody’s India Representative Director and a co-author of the report.

“There are material residual issues regarding checks and balances, but these are generic to corporate India and not isolated to family companies – for example, the lack of activist shareholders and a business and cultural environment that does not permit hostile mergers and acquisitions. Furthermore, important governance issues persist in areas not covered by regulation,” says Mr Modi.

“The lack of board nomination sub-committees in many companies suggests that succession planning is not fully deliberated with independent directors. There is often insufficient transparency on ownership/control, related-party transactions and the group’s overall financial position. Also, the prospect remains of higher leverage as families try to maintain control while implementing their often aggressive growth plans,” adds Mr Anjan Ghosh, ICRA’s General Manager and a co-author of the report.

More Stories on : Corporate Governance

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Accutest Labs expands clinical research


Cookson Electronics opens R&D centre in Bangalore
Korean co to make set-top boxes for Tata Sky
Norms issued for stock options valuation
HC to hear Glivec issue on Nov 6
Suzlon Energy: Making up for last quarter
Patent for 3 Suven products
Sujana Towers debentures
GMR’s verticals to have brand identities of their own
Corporate governance: Survey lists pros and cons of family owned cos
GM setting up facility for powertrains
USFDA nod for Sun Pharma drug
ITC signs MoU with Nagaland, Spices Board
GVFL invests Rs 4 cr in Sahajanand Laser Tech
Subhkam invests in MSK Projects
Continental taps Siemens VDO to make India its strategic hub
Ashok Leyland reports modest sales figures; net dips 16%


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line