Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Tuesday, Nov 20, 2007
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Industry & Economy - Social Security
Corporate - Courts/Legal Issues
States - Tamil Nadu
Contractors for State projects must implement PF laws: HC

Our Legal Correspondent

Chennai, Nov 19

Those who were submitting tenders for supply of goods and services to the State-owned undertakings should be responsible to implement the provident fund law in respect of employees engaged by them, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court has held. Apprehension of contractors that the stipulation was arbitrary could not be accepted.

Dismissing a batch of writ petitions challenging rules prescribed under the Employees Providend Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 that tender schedules must be registered and must have a registration number accorded by the department in future, Mr Justice K. Chandru noted that interest of petitioners, who were made contractors, was only with a view to avoiding various obligations. In the name of liberalisation, State could not be a mute spectator to allow contractors to ignore welfare of labour.

The conditions imposed in the tender schedules notification impugned in petitions only enhanced mandate under Part III and Para IV of the Constitution. Contentions voiced by petitioners, who had been executing projects undertaken by TN Small Industries Development Corpn Ltd (SIDCO), that it should be ensured that workmen engaged by them were regular workers and also they were liable to be covered by the State Act, might be relevant when this court examined any demand by the PF Dept with reference to contribution by petitioners’ establishments, the Judge said.

The court was concerned with the 5th respondent (SIDCO), a State instrument authority, who had to take proper care by securing itself by such conditions which would not bring any future liability for claims made under the PF Act. Petitioners submitted that if contract was awarded to them, they were bound to enforce those statutory obligations. But putting it as a precondition, they had edged out of competition. Hence, they sought aid of this court to quash the condition imposed in tender schedules floated by 5th respondent.

More Stories on : Social Security | Courts/Legal Issues | Tamil Nadu

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Pension scheme for senior citizens living below poverty line launched


Contractors for State projects must implement PF laws: HC
Brace up for stronger Re, Kamath tells India Inc
‘Chemplast units will be ‘zero discharge’ from January’
MSEZL gets final notification
NCR Corp to automate HPCL, BPCL outlets
House panel for independent assessment of ethanol availability
Direct tax collections up 42.9%
Kerala opposes VAT cut by other States
SIDBI to help Ludhiana’s steel forging units adopt cleaner technologies
‘Software as a service’ poised for growth in India
The showman arrives on a horse back
HP, Vinayaka Missions tie up
IIM-A placements: All 263 students get plum offers
In pact with Korean varsity
Honeywell, VTU initiatives
Realty consortium to raise $100 m from London AIM
Offer unique properties, Trump tells realty cos
Russia offers India investment option in uranium project in Siberia
Uranium plant to come up in Kadapa
A film screening with a difference
Indian investment welcome: London Mayor
Exports to US from private box terminals up in July-Oct


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line