Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Wednesday, Feb 13, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Agri-Biz & Commodities - Industry Associations
‘Raise import tariff on tapioca starch’


“There is no mechanism to find out the extent of import of starch taking place in the garb of modified starch.”


Our Bureau

Coimbatore, Feb. 12 The Salem-based United Farmers Association has said import of tapioca starch continues to hurt the domestic tuber growers and starch producers, despite the Centre imposing safeguard duty.

The association felt the safeguard duty failed to check imports as it was extended only to tapioca starch; whereas import of modified starch was not brought under the levy. There is no mechanism to find out the extent of import of starch taking place in the garb of modified starch, it said.

The association’s President, Mr Vaiyapuri, in a representation to the Centre, has said there is a need for the Centre to undertake an appraisal on the effect of the safeguard duty mechanism as imports of tapioca starch continued unabated and it has affected both the growers and the domestic industry.

One of the reasons for the growing imports is the dithering on the part of the Centre in raising the tariff line on starch imports. Under the World Trade Organisation (WTO) commitments, the duty on tapioca starch, sago and modified starch could be raised to 100-150 per cent, considering the injury the imports could cause on domestic growers and industry.

The Government, too, originally was willing to consider increasing the basic customs duty from 30 per cent to 50 per cent. But, it later chose to levy safeguard duty only; that too on tapioca starch alone. This had led to the effective duty incident on the product to remain lower, the association said, adding that there is a need to protect the tapioca, a crop that has dual value as an important input to both food and industrial application, by raising the import tariff on starch/modified starch.

Irrigation policies

The farmers body in its submission wanted the Government to discourage raising intensive wet-crops using sub-soil water as the increased water stress caused by such practices contributed to depletion of groundwater and moisture erosion with spin off effect on global warming.

The association has, in this regard, favoured future irrigation supportive policies to lay emphasis on extending State assistances such as free electricity or micro irrigation subsidies for rain fed irrigation or to those who are actively engaged in drip irrigation that bring less pressure on ground water halting environmental degradation.

More Stories on : Industry Associations

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Chill factor rules supreme


Experimental organic paddy harvested at Vadakkencherry
Spot rubber prices rebound
Implement sugar package in ‘letter & spirit’, bank chiefs told
Tea exports drop 30%; output dips marginally
‘Raise import tariff on tapioca starch’
Paddy processing research centre gets national institute status
Jute procurement from AP suspended
Volatility crushes pepper futures
Confusion over rice export ban notification
India hails revised WTO texts on agriculture, NAMA
‘Small farmers must get their share of credit’

BusinessLine E-paper


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line