Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Monday, Feb 25, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Home Page - Power
Corporate - Bonus Announcements
Markets - IPOs
Legal, tax aspects of RPower bonus announcement

Kripa Raman
Advertisement

Mumbai, Feb. 24 The issue of three free shares for every five RPower shares held “compensates” investors only if the bonus shares are given to the original IPO allottees of RPower, said a section of market players. “If I have been allotted shares at Rs 430 in the IPO and I have sold them off at Rs 350 to somehow pay back my creditors, the bonus issue of shares is not going to compensate me, but the person who bought from me at Rs 350. Whereas it is I who took the risk and deserves to be compensated,” said Mr Arun Kejriwal of Kejriwal Research and Information Services. “So the record date is important.”

Of course, RPower is not obliged to make a bonus offer by law, but if it wants its bonus offer to be considered “compensatory” in spirit, then it can use as a precedent, an order of the Supreme Court in the Bausch & Lomb case, said an official who deals with legal matters at a leading brokerage. The court directed Italy-based Luxottica, which acquired Bausch & Lomb overseas and, consequently 44 per cent in B&L’s Indian business (currently Rayban), to make an open offer to the Indian shareholders. Interestingly, the court also asked Luxottica to include in the offer price an interest rate of 10 per cent per annum calculated from the date the open offer got triggered. This interest would be applicable to only those shareholders who both held shares on the date when the open offer was triggered and continued to hold the shares on the closure date of the public offer, said the court. Of course, there were very few investors who actually held shares for those five or seven years. But for RPower, a parallel move would be to offer the bonus shares only to IPO allottees and among them, to those who also continue to hold the shares till the record date, said the legal expert. There is also the question of whether Mr Anil Ambani’s voluntary contribution of 2.6 per cent of his shareholding to Reliance Energy would lead to a tax liability for REL. If it is a “gift” (which is how Mr Anil Ambani referred to it once at the news conference), then would it fetch gift tax, since Mr Ambani is not a blood relative of Reliance Energy? Gifts of more than Rs 30,000 made by persons who are not blood relatives fetch tax at 30 per cent. “It is too early to tell yet what the interpretation might be,” said a tax consultant.

More Stories on : Power | Bonus Announcements | IPOs | Courts/Legal Issues | Taxation

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Clasic Hiring

Stories in this Section
IEX to get Nord Pool’s expertise for going live


Virgin Atlantic operates first flight on bio-fuel
Balancing prosperity with stability
Oil retailers want PFs to invest more in their bonds
3:5 bonus from Reliance Power; effective price will be Rs 269
Legal, tax aspects of RPower bonus announcement
SCI may call off tender for fleet managers
Pfizer (Rs 632.90): Buy
Indirect taxes may exceed budget targets: Chidambaram
Day Trading Guide
How IT workers are serving beyond the call of profession
Gold price likely to pause
Premium edible oil players eye low-end segments
Sensex, Nifty among world’s worst performers
Dalal Street to see subdued trading ahead of Budget

BusinessLine E-paper


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line