Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Thursday, Mar 20, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Home Page - Pharmaceuticals
Marketing - IPR
Corporate - Courts/Legal Issues
Get Latest BSE Quote
Patent case: HC declines to restrain Cipla

Making, selling generic version of Roche’s Tarceva


Our Bureau

Mumbai, March 19 Cipla will be able to continue selling its generic version of Roche’s lung-cancer drug Tarceva, after the Delhi High Court (HC) refused to grant an interim stay that would restrain Cipla from making and selling the medicine.

Roche had filed a patent-infringement suit against Cipla, after the Mumbai-based drug maker locally launched Erlotinib (the generic version of Tarceva), despite Roche having been granted a patent on the drug last year.

In its interim order the court, however, also asked Cipla to maintain accounts of sales, which would be relevant to calculate the damages to Roche, in case the Swiss-drug maker eventually won the case.

“Disappointed” with the day’s development, Roche’s Managing Director in India, Dr Girish Telang, told Business Line that “the country should respect the patent law and the patent agreement that we have with WTO (the World Trade Organisation)”. He declined to comment on whether the company would appeal today’s interim order.

The pricing of Tarceva also came in for a mention, with the court indicating that Cipla’s patent challenge was arguable, given that several patients were using the cancer drug and the price of Roche’s Tarceva was high, said a lawyer familiar with the case. Also, Roche did not manufacture the drug locally, it observed.

Cipla launched the drug late last year in the domestic market at Rs 1,600. Roche sells Tarceva at Rs 4,800 per tablet, tantamounting to over Rs 1 lakh per month, as the medicine is to be taken once a day.

Patent experts point out that Roche’s Tarceva was becoming the next Glivec. There too, the price difference between Novartis’ cancer drug Glivec and the generic similars made by local drug companies was steep. And this resulted in Glivec’s patent application drawing attention from local and international patient groups, besides a slew of litigations.

Ms Prathiba M. Singh, Cipla’s counsel, said that the interim order showed that the courts were capable of dealing with such patent issues.

Related Stories:
Roche files patent suit against Cipla over Tarceva

More Stories on : Pharmaceuticals | IPR | Courts/Legal Issues | Cipla Ltd | Corporate Disputes

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Clasic Hiring

Stories in this Section
Lower Fed rates may help cos with dollar liabilities


3G auction will be open to both existing and new operators
Cement consumption bounces back in February
Robust advance tax payments may allay slowdown fears
Infrastructure industries’ growth slumps to 4.2% in Jan
New Hyderabad international airport: The inaugural & after
Patent case: HC declines to restrain Cipla
MMTC to market Chinese truck-bus tyres in India
Poor response to Mumbai auction weakens realty further
Software exports seen at $45 b this fiscal
Indian pepper turns out to be most competitive
Fed must pray for house price recovery
Marketmen discount Fed rate cut
Institutional investors must pay margins: SEBI
Sensex loses steam after a bullish start


BusinessLine E-paper


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line