Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Saturday, Mar 22, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Opinion - Editorial
Oil logic


The differential duty between crude and refined oils has favoured refiners and effectively kept traders out of import business.


Does New Delhi have a well-thought out strategy to fight inflation and protect the interests of the poor, who are hit the hardest? There is little evidence the government has a comprehensive strategy. Action comes in spurts, without specifically targeted outcomes. In its seemingly losing battle over inflation control, the Centre has begun to fire missiles in all directions. Individually, the missiles are weak; and collectively, they are in danger of fizzling out because of poor timing. There is, then, the attendant risk of missing the price control objective. Commodity-related policy actions taken in the last 12 months have largely been trade and tariff measures; but none of these, either jointly or severally, brought tangible relief to the really needy. On the ground, the price situation continues to remain a cause for serious concern.

After the ban on edible oil export, it is a reduction in the basic Customs duty on select vegetable oils. Even in this belated yet welcome move, there is limited application of mind. Palm oil has been favoured with a sizeable duty reduction of 25 percentage points to 20 per cent ad valorem, while duty on mustard and sunflower oils has also been slashed to 20 per cent. What about soyabean oil? The rate of duty on soyabean oil is 45 per cent; and, after palm oil, soyabean oil is the second largest in our import basket. Ironically, even as the Government made up its mind about duty reduction, international prices are beginning to come off their recent highs. This reflects a poor sense of timing and lack of commercial intelligence. The Finance Ministry needs to beef up its research and analytical skills. The second issue that deserves attention but has been overlooked is the duty differential between crude and refined oils. The logic of duty differential, though valid, is unhelpful. It is common knowledge that a handful of large refiners control the country’s vegetable oil market and swing prices at will. The differential duty between crude and refined oils has favoured refiners and effectively kept traders out of import business.

If the government is really serious about making a dent in domestic market prices, it should be bold enough to withstand lobby pressure and encourage import of readily marketable refined oils by allowing both crude and refined oils at the same rate of duty. This strategy, essentially short-term, may be reviewed at the time of kharif oilseeds harvest later in the year. Finally, there is simply no alternative to addressing the supply side issue of raising domestic production to meet the growing demand. The oilseeds sector represents a major policy failure of successive governments.

Related Stories:
Customs duty on cooking oils slashed
Ban on edible oils export
Export ban unlikely to deliver results

More Stories on : Editorial | Oilseeds & Edible Oil

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Oil logic


Retrospective liability under the MAT
A narrow view on charity
Clear the air for the heirs as well
IMF grappling with fiscal woes
Entertainment & Media: Demands that await a break
Adjustments to book profits
Driven by greed


BusinessLine E-paper


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line