Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Monday, Feb 17, 2003

Mentor
Features
Stocks
Port Info
Archives

Group Sites

Mentor - Accountancy


Distributing joint costs

Roger Gibbins

Roger Gibbins explains how to apportion joint costs to multiple products

IT IS OFTEN the case that a company will operate a process of some type that is dedicated to the production of just a single product, such as margarine. Frequently however, a company may undertake a process from which more than one product emerges — each of which have some commercial value.

Crude oil is input into a process and many different products flow out — petrol, kerosene and heavier oil products. It is also quite common for other items to flow out of a process, scrap for example, which will have no significant commercial value, but may generate some minimal revenue. Scrap, however, may have no value, and generate additional cost in disposing of it safely.

Equally, the process may produce a by-product in addition to the main products. By-products are usually unavoidably produced as a consequence of producing the main products. They can usually be sold for minimal amounts — this income can be credited to the process account (by offsetting this against material cost) or credited directly to the profit and loss account.

The `main' or `joint products' (that is, those having a commercial value) must each be apportioned with an `equitable' amount of the joint costs incurred during the process. Chart 1 is a simple diagrammatic representation of a process with common inputs and outputs consisting of joint products. Products A, B and C are the `main' or `joint' products, being those with a significant commercial value. Other outflows that can arise are `by-products', `scrap' or `waste'.

The three products are manufactured using common resources which are referred to as `joint costs' — the three products emerging are referred to as `joint products'.

The main accounting problems

The main problems from a cost accounting point of view is how to `share out' or apportion the joint costs between the joint products, and secondly how to deal with the revenue arising from the sale of by-product and scrap or the costs incurred in disposing of scrap or waste. Care is needed in differentiating between scrap and waste. The two primary methods for apportioning costs between joint products are:

  • in proportion to the physical weight of output of each product, or

  • in proportion to the revenue arising from the sale of each product.

    The revenue from the sale of by-product and scrap can either be credited to the process account or directly to the profit and loss account. Disposal costs of scrap or waste are normally debited to the process account.

    Example 1: There are three joint products and scrap. Company A manufactures three products, X, Y and Z, in a single process using common resources.

    Inputs into the process for a month were:

    Direct material: 40,000 kg at a total cost of £90,000

    Direct labour: £120,000

    Factory overheads are absorbed at a rate of 130 per cent of direct labour cost. There is a normal loss of 10 per cent of input — this can be sold as scrap for £1.50 per kg with the proceeds being credited to the process account.

    The outputs from the process for the month were:

    Product X: 20,000 kg (which can be sold for £12.00 per kg)

    Product Y: 10,000 kg (which can be sold for £18.24 per kg)

    Product Z: 6,000 kg (which can be sold for £9.60 per kg)

    Required: a) Calculate separately the joint product cost for each of Products X, Y and Z based on: i) the relative weight of output; ii) the relative revenue arising from the sale of the products.

    b) Product Y can be converted by means of a further process into Product Y2. The selling price of Product Y2 would be £30 per kg. Conversion cost would amount to £10 per kg input and there would be a loss in process equivalent to 5 per cent of the material input.

    Required: Calculate the effect on profit if all the output of Product Y is converted to Product Y2.

    Solution (a)(i): Evaluation of joint products based on comparative weight of output:

    Stage 1: Calculate the total cost of the process:

    Direct materials (as given) — £90,000

    Direct labour (as given) — £120,000

    Factory overhead (at 130 per cent of labour cost) — £156,000

    Less scrap proceeds (4,000 x £1.50) — £(6,000)

    Total net process cost — £360,000

    A common error that can occur in this situation is to forget to credit the value of the scrap proceeds to the process.

    Stage 2: Calculate total saleable output in kg: 20,000 + 10,000 + 6,000 = 36,000 (Note: 4,000 kg were scrapped and do not need to be considered when apportioning the total cost to Products X, Y and Z).

    A common error that can occur in this situation is to apportion cost to products as a proportion of 40,000 kg.

    Stage 3: Calculate the proportion of the total weight relating to each individual product and multiply this by the total process cost:

    Product X = (20,000 ÷ 36,000) x £360,000 = £200,000

    Product Y = (10,000 ÷ 36,000) x £360,000 = £100,000

    Product Z = (6,000 ÷ 36,000) x £360,000 = £60,000

    Total joint cost as above — £360,000

    A common error that can occur in this situation is to apportion cost to the scrap.

    Solution (a)(ii): Evaluation of joint products based on comparative revenue from sale of products:

    Stage 1: Calculate total revenue from sale of products:

    Product X = 20,000 x £12.00 = £240,000

    Product Y = 10,000 x £18.24 = £182,400

    Product Z = 6,000 x £9.60 = £57,600

    Total revenue — £480,000

    Stage 2: Calculate the proportion of the total revenue relating to each individual product and multiply this by the total process cost:

    Product X = (240,000 ÷ 480,000) x £360,000 = £180,000

    Product Y = (182,400 ÷ 480,000) x £360,000 = £136,800

    Product Z = (57,600 ÷ 480,000) x £360,000 = £43,200

    Total joint cost as above — £360,000

    A common error that can occur in this situation is to apportion cost based on relative selling price per unit of product instead of total revenue per product.

    Other considerations

    Scrap: If the scrap in the above scenario had no saleable value, then the total cost to be apportioned would be £366,000 rather than £360,000 — meaning that total cost to be apportioned in both cases would be greater:

    Solution (a)(i): Evaluation of joint products based on comparative weight of output (assuming scrap had no value):

    Product X = (20,000 ÷ 36,000) x £366,000 = £203,333

    Product Y = (10,000 ÷ 36,000) x £366,000 = £101,667

    Product Z = (6,000 ÷ 36,000) x £366,000 = £61,000

    Total joint cost as above — £366,000

    Solution (a)(ii): Evaluation of joint products based on comparative revenue from sale of products (assuming scrap had no value).

    Product X = (240,000 ÷ 480,000) x £366,000 = £183,000

    Product Y = (182,400 ÷ 480,000) x £366,000 = £139,080

    Product Z = (57,600 ÷ 480,000) x £366,000 = £43,920

    Total joint cost as above — £366,000

    Solution b: Effect on profit of further processing decisions: If further processing takes place then the following will occur:

    1) The revenue from sale of Y2 will be (10,000 x 0.95 x £30) = £285,000

    2) The revenue from Y will not occur and be lost = £(182,400)

    3) Further processing costs will be incurred (10,000 x £10) = (100,000)

    Net effect on profit would be a gain of — £2,600

    Common errors that can occur in this situation are:

    to forget to deduct the revenue from the sale of the product in its original form

    to forget to allow for the process loss when calculating the revenue from the converted product.

    (Edited extracts from student accountant, an ACCA publication. wwwaccaglobal.com)

    Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication

  • Stories in this Section
    A single process and three products


    Distributing joint costs
    Doubts to clear before I quit
    How money moves in e-commerce
    An old friend in the next seat
    Capsuled genius


    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |

    Copyright © 2003, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line