![]() Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Monday, Nov 17, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mentor
-
Accountancy Columns - For the Asking Why are businesses tax-blind and job-stingy?
You are referring to Section 80JJAA of the Income-tax Act that gives a 190 per cent weighted deduction spanning three years for industries employing 10 per cent more vis-à-vis the previous year's strength and also for new industries employing more than 100 persons. Business is not the function of tax incentives alone. In fact, the income-tax incentive, prima facie, attractive as it is, is antediluvian deep down. It is not in keeping with times when the accent is on cost cutting, automation and mechanisation. In capital intensive and highly automated industry, the move was bound to elicit a lukewarm response. Besides, given our labour laws and lack of reforms in this front, employers do not want to court trouble by going for more and more permanent employees. Greenfield projects are simply not coming up in the face of freer imports and glut situation staring some industries. There are, however, avenues that are intrinsically labour-intensive. Road laying and four/six laning of national and state highways could provide significant employment opportunities. The Government's ambitious river-linking project could also provide tremendous employment opportunities.
Penny-wise
I am afraid you are not entitled for any tax relief on the sales that you have already made. The exemption under Section 10(36) requires purchase of BSE 500 shares during the financial year 2003-04 and holding them for 12 months or more. Yes, the investment made in BSE-500 shares during 2003-04 would qualify for tax exemption if and when sold only if you allow them to become long-term assets.
Left, right
In all humility, I plead ignorance. But the wily Chanakya would be squirming in his grave at the rising trend of liabilities being left out in the cold for leftovers.
Holding period
As per Section 45(2A), FIFO (first in first out) is the norm for shares held in demat mode.
No. He has not yet crossed the limit of Rs 10 lakh for turnover as well as the limit of Rs 1.20 lakh for profit set by Section 44AA(2) the crossing of which alone compels him to maintain books of accounts.
(ASK! Send in your queries on accounting, auditing, corporate law and taxation to ask@thehindu.co.in)
S. Murlidharan
Article
E-Mail
::
Comment
::
Syndication
|
Stories in this Section |
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line
|