![]() Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Monday, Mar 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mentor
-
Accountancy LP model in a paint company
P. V. Rathnam
There are no limitations on other resources. The particulars of sale forecasts and estimated contribution to overheads and profits are given in Table 2.
Due to commitments already made, a minimum of 200 kilolitres per month of Aurota has to be necessarily supplied the next year. Just as the company was able to finalise the monthly production programme for the next 12 months, an offer was received from a nearby competitor for hiring 50 machine shifts per month of milling capacity for grinding Diana paint, that can be spared for at least a year. However, due to additional handling and the profit margin of the competitor involved, by using this facility, the contribution from Diana will get reduced by Rs 1.50 per litre. Formulate this problem as a linear programming (LP) model for determining the monthly production programme to maximise contribution. You are not required to solve the LP model. Let x litres of Venus grade paint, y litres of Diana grade paint and
z litres of Aurota grade paint be manufactured as shown in Table 3. Maximisation of contribution: Maximise z = 4x + (3.6 - 1.5)y + 2.5z z = 4x + 2.1y + 2.5z Subject to constraints Special additive: 0.30 x + 0.25 y + 0.75 z less than or equal to 6,50,000 Milling x/2500 + y/ 3500 + z/5000 less than or equal to 110 - 55 x/2500 x 35000 + y/3500 x 35000 + z/5000 x 35000 less than or equal to 55 x 35,000 14x + 10 y + 7z less than or equal to 19,25,000 Packing: x/12000 + y/12000 + z/12000 less than or equal to 100 x + y + z =100 x 12,000 = 12,00,000 0.30x + 0.25y + 0.75z less than or equal to 6,50,000 14x +10y + 7z less than or equal to 19,25,000 x + y + z less than or equal to 12,00,000 Subject to x being less than or equal to 1,20,000 Y being less than or equal to 4,50,000 2,00,000 being less than or equal to and z being less than or equal to 6,00,000. (2,00,000 is prior commitment)
Right option
Variable cost ratio is a complement of PV ratio. When PV ratio is 40 per cent, variable cost ratio is 60 per cent of sales. Sixty per cent of Rs 10,000 will be Rs 6,000. Hence option (b) is correct.
S = 60/4 = 15 per hour.
R = 12/15, that is, 4/5
A = 60/5 =12 per hour.
The probability of server being idle is 1 - R, that is, 1 - 4/5 = 1/5, that is, 20 per cent. Hence, option (b) is correct.
SR = BFO/BQ, that is, Rs 24,000 / 4,800 units = Rs 5 per unit.
Fixed overhead volume variance = SR (AQ - BQ)
5 (4200 - 4800) = Rs 3000 A. Hence, option (a) is correct.
Flexible budgeting
Installed capacity: 20,000 kg of yarn
Production and sales: 14,000 kg of yarn
The income and expenditure details are given in Table 4.
i) The managing director wishes to expand the operation for the year 2003-04 and has asked you to prepare Flexible Budgets on capacity utilisation levels of 80 per cent, 90 per cent and 100 per cent based on the following estimate:
a) Price (Rs/kg of yarn) at 80 per cent level Rs 210; at 90 per cent level Rs 200; at 100 per cent Rs 195
Whatever produced during the year is expected to be sold within the year.
b) Increase in variable cost components: materials at12 per cent; labour at 10 per cent; factory overheads at 15 per cent; and marketing overheads at 20 per cent.
c) Inflation rate applicable to fixed cost is 15 per cent. Additionally, if the capacity utilisation exceeds 80 per cent, fixed cost is expected to increase by 10 per cent up to 100 per cent capacity utilisation.
Comment on this plan of sub-contracting with a view to maximising the profit of the company.
The flexible budget (100 per cent capacity 20,000 kg) is shown in Table 5.
Sub-contracting:
Cost (4,000 x 105) = Rs 4,20,000
Variable cost (mfg) 4,000 x 102 = Rs 4,08,000
Incremental cost on sub-contracting Rs 12,000
Increase in fixed cost saved Rs 1,12,700
Net saving Rs 1,00,700
The profit is worked out in Table 6.
The production manager's plan of sub-contracting the production of 4,000 kg will result into the incremental profit of Rs 1,00,700. Then the profit of the company will maximise at Rs 7,21,000.
The working note is presented in Table 7.
Queue system
Operatives are paid a wage rate of Rs 20 per hour. If the crew size is doubled, the unloading rate can be increased to 18 trucks per hour.
When a truck is kept waiting idle an hourly demurrage charge at the rate of Rs 60 has to be paid.
Determine whether it would be worthwhile to employ a second crew. You may assume that the conditions of a (M/M/1) queue system as applicable.
Arrival rate (lambda) = 8 per hour
Service rate (mu)= 10 per hour
Present cost of unloading [for three operatives] = 3 x 20 per hour = Rs 60 per hour.
Traffic intensity = P = lambda/mu = 8/10 = 0.80
Average queue length = P2/1 - P = (0.80){+2} = 0.80 x 0.80 / 1 - 0.800.20 = 3.2
Opportunity cost per unit time = 60 x 3.2 = Rs 192
Actual cost of current year = 60 x 3.2 = Rs 192
Total cost of current year = opportunity cost + actual cost = 192 + 192 = Rs 384
Proposal: If crew is doubled, service rate = mu = 18 per hour
Cost of unloading [for six operatives] = 6 x 20 = Rs 120 per hour
Traffic intensity = P lambda/mu = 8/18 = 4/9 = 0.44
Average queue length = P2/1-P = (0.44){+2} /1-0.44 = 0.44 x 0.44/0.56 = 0.35
Opportunity cost = 60 x 0.35 = Rs 21
Actual cost = 120 x 0.35 = Rs 42
Total cost = 21 + 42 = Rs 63
Thus the total cost of by employing second crew is less than the single crew. Hence, it is worthwhile employing the second crew.
Note: Decision to employ second crew will not change even if we consider total salary for crew is taken as Rs 20 per hour.
Simulation
The management of the company wants to study the investment in a project based on the following three factors: a) market demand, b) profitability, and
c) amount of investment required.
In analysing a new consumer product, the corporation estimates the probability distribution shown in Table 8.
The following random numbers are to be used:
a) For demand: 28, 57, 60, 17, 64, 20, 27, 58, 61, 30.
b) For profit: 19, 07, 90, 02, 57, 28, 29, 83, 58, 41.
c) For investment: 18, 67, 16, 71, 43, 68, 47, 24, 19, 97.
Required: Using simulation technique, repeat the trial ten times, compute the return on investment for each trial considering these three factors into account. Approximately,what is the highest likely return?
The annual demand, profit per unit and investment required are presented in Tables 9, 10, and 11 respectively. And from Table 12 it can be said that the highest return is Rs 3,15,000 on the sale of 35,000 units.
(To be continued)
(Suggested answers to the December 2003 ICWA (Stage II) paper on management accounting.)
Article
E-Mail
::
Comment
::
Syndication
|
Stories in this Section |
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2004, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line
|