![]() Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Monday, Jan 24, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
eWorld
-
Trends Info-Tech - Human Resources Backgrounds to the fore N.S. Vageesh
A CANDIDATE, claiming to have worked with an MNC, submitted documents in support of his employment with the company. An official of the HR department of the MNC, when contacted, confirmed that the candidate had worked with the MNC but highlighted a discrepancy in the information, saying the candidate had overstated his period of employment by almost two years. The documents submitted by the candidate were declared fake by the HR department due to the following reasons:
When the signatory was confronted with the documents, he admitted to having issued the letter without any authority, in order to help his friend. The candidate was rejected and his colleague, too, lost his job for participating in a fraudulent act. That was from the files of Quest Research, a leading background screening specialist company. As is evident from the pie charts provided by them, discrepancies and false claims in resumes are a growing concern for companies (and good business for them!).
Says Yogesh Bhura, Managing Director (South Asia), Quest Research, which does about 15,000 checks a month, "Falsification is a very old practice. It is only now that professionally managed companies are paying more attention to the issue, and there is more awareness and media attention about this than ever before. This problem is rampant across all levels of hierarchy within an organisation. Those who falsify their résumé would constitute 10 to 15 per cent of the total new recruits." Does having a background-screening programme help? Companies with background-screening programmes would see a decline in the percentage of falsification as the practice matures, says Bhura.
Agreeing with this view, Vivek Aggarwal, Senior Manager (Marketing and Corporate Strategy), Hill & Associates, background screening specialists, cites the example of a Pune-based company which was able to bring down its receipt of fake certificates from 24 per cent to about 18 per cent. As word gets around that the company would perform a pre-employment screening, the possibility of mischief-making reduces. Is there a geographical element to this problem? Are some areas more guilty than others? Bhura says no clear geographical pattern is visible. Aggarwal, however, points out that there is a slightly higher number of fake certificates from Tier-II cities (the likes of Hyderabad, Pune, Chandigarh). This, he explains, could be partly because of inadequate awareness on the part of candidates that they could be screened. Yet, after all that is done in terms of screening, do companies sometimes choose to overlook discrepancies because of hiring pressure? Bhura says he has not encountered such instances, saying it would defeat the purpose of the exercise. But some companies do sometimes succumb to the pressure because they need manpower. With the security environment worsening, these are, however, likely to become rare exceptions in future.
Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page
|
Stories in this Section |
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2005, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line
|