Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) has been ordered by a consumer forum here to pay Rs 20,000 as compensation to one of its credit card holders for adding his name in CIBIL’s defaulters list even though he had paid all his dues.
While awarding the amount to the HSBC credit card holder, the New Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum said the Bank should have “gracefully” accepted its fault instead of adopting an “obstructionist attitude” by seeking rejection of his complaint.
“We are shocked to observe the obstructionist attitude of opposite party (HSBC) which instead of accepting the fault gracefully by filing a reply has sought rejection of the complaint on ground of remedy of arbitration under the Credit Information Bureau (India) Limited (CIBIL) Act,” said the bench presided by C.K Chaturvedi said.
“It (HSBC) has not disputed facts. The remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is not affected by the arbitration agreement. We dismiss the application of the opposite party and award a compensation of Rs 20,000 to the complainant (Rakesh Gupta) inclusive of litigation expenses,” said the bench.
Delhi resident Rakesh Gupta in his complaint had alleged that he had been issued a HSBC credit card on understanding that no annual charges would be levied, yet after the first two months of usage the Bank started levying the charges.
When he made a representation to the bank about annual charges, the same were reversed temporarily, he said adding that in 2006 he paid all the outstanding dues and asked the bank to close the card.
Rakesh Gupta alleged the bank, instead of closing the card, continued showing the annual charges as outstanding and informed CIBIL that he was a defaulter, without giving him a notice.
The bank had sought dismissal of the complaint against it on the ground that the remedy available was through arbitration only.
Keywords: Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, HSBC ordered by consumer forum, pay Rs 20, 000 as compensation, credit card holder, adding his name in CIBIL’s defaulters list, he paid all his dues, New Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, obstructionist attitude of bank, sought rejection of complaint on ground of remedy of arbitration, Credit Information Bureau (India) Limited (CIBIL) Act, C.K Chaturvedi, Consumer Protection Act, Delhi resident Rakesh Gupta, no annual charges would be levied, Bank started levying charges


Comments:
HSBC should have been fined Rs 200,000 instead of Rs. 20,000. What about
the people who have paid without taking them to court. There should be
some accountabilty and some of the senior managers must be thrown in the
jail for few days at least to make a point
At least now HSBC will probably get it into their thick heads that a legal recourse other than arbitration is the right of each and every Indian.
Low fines like rs. 20K enables corporates to quickly forget the 'lessons' that they are learn thru court judgements.
ST, Navi Mumbai
Please Email the Editor