Another House panel to look into CAG report on DIAL

A. M. Jigeesh
Comment (1)   ·   print   ·  
Fresh trouble is brewing for Delhi International Airport Ltd (DIAL) ...
Fresh trouble is brewing for Delhi International Airport Ltd (DIAL) ...

Committee on Public Undertakings seeks details of DIAL-AAI contract

Fresh trouble is brewing for Delhi International Airport Ltd (DIAL).

Yet another Parliament panel, the Committee on Public Undertakings (CoPU), has decided to consider the Comptroller and Auditor General’s (CAG) report on implementation of public-private partnership project by Airports Authority of India (AAI) at Indira Gandhi International Airport, Delhi.

While the Public Accounts Committee has already started deliberations on the report, the committee on subordinate legislation of the Rajya Sabha is verifying the AAI (Major Airports) Development Fees Rules, 2011, which empowered DIAL to levy fee from passengers.

The CoPU, headed by senior Congress MP Jagadambika Pal, will be looking at the implementation of operation, management and development agreement (OMDA) signed by the AAI and DIAL. It will particularly look into paragraph 2.3 of the CAG report, which discussed the concession period provided to the developer, allegedly violating a Cabinet note in 2003. Sources in the panel said the CAG will make a presentation on the report at its meeting here on Thursday.

CoPU is likely to call key officials of Civil Aviation Ministry, AAI and Airports Economic Regulatory Authority on the issue for the details of the contract between DIAL and AAI.

“This is a serious report. All CAG reports that comment on public sector undertakings will be reviewed,” a panel member said.

The CAG report, tabled in Parliament during the winter session, had said that a Cabinet note in 2003 said the existing 30 years’ concession to the developer on traffic volumes, tariffs, concession period and capital costs could be extended by another 30 years only after a mutual agreement and negotiation of terms by the developer and AAI.

“However, as per the final bid documents, the ‘subject to mutual agreement and negotiation of terms’ was left out,” the report had said, adding that the OMDA, signed in April 2006, did not contain any provision of mutual agreement and fresh negotiations before extension of the concession period.

The report had pointed out that DIAL got the right to extend the term for another 30 years because of this lapse.

“This is not only a violation of the commitment in the initial Cabinet Note but also unilateral and unfair advantage given to DIAL which is detrimental to Government interest, as it does not provide the Government any scope for review of any of the conditions in OMDA and SSA,” the CAG had added.

(This article was published on October 16, 2012)
XThese are links to The Hindu Business Line suggested by Outbrain, which may or may not be relevant to the other content on this page. You can read Outbrain's privacy and cookie policy here.


Airport operators whether delhi airport or mumbai int airport, how long they shall collect airport development fees from the air passengers? Delay in implementation of project by which cost overuns, why passengers should bear the cost? Income/revenue of airport developers is fast increasing from aeronautical & non aeronautical fields. There is infact no need to permit airport developers to collect airport development charge from the passengers, eventhough AAI/aera has granted permission is an action against air passengers, there is no fair ground for permission granted. It is open that taxes/charges are highest in india still ministry of civil avaition has not taken due remedial measures.

Posted on: Oct 17, 2012 at 08:34 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor



Recent Article in Logistics

SpiceJet currently has 17 Boeing 737s and 15 Bombardier Q400s in its fleet.

SpiceJet to add 7 planes; another Rs 500 cr infusion in April

As it embarks on a revival path, budget carrier SpiceJet plans to lease seven more Boeing 737 aircraft by May while another Rs 500 crore... »

Comments to: Copyright © 2015, The Hindu Business Line.