Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Sunday, Aug 10, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio

Investment World
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Investment World - Economics
Columns - Simple Economics
Food for thought

B. Venkatesh

Recently, my friend and his school mates went to an expensive restaurant during their school reunion. His experience is “food for thought” for economics buffs.

The group, he recalled, ordered more than they could eat and wasted lot of food. How can economics explain their spending behaviour?

Suppose you and your friend go to an expensive restaurant. You find that a large portion of your favourite meal costs Rs 450 while a smaller portion costs Rs 320. Which would you order?

If you are dining alone, your choice would depend on whether you will derive a greater satisfaction by paying Rs 130 more for the larger portion. If not, you will settle for a smaller portion.

Experimenting with food

Now, what if you and your friend decide to share the cost? You may reason out that a large portion would be a good deal. Why? You have to pay only Rs 65 more for ordering the larger portion; your friend will bear the balance.

Extend the argument to my friend and his school buddies. They knew that the dinner tab would be split among the group. So, there was a tendency for each of them to experiment with the food. Why?

Suppose one of them had a sober diet. That person would still end-up paying for others’ excesses. So, he might as well splurge like the others. The game then becomes economically inefficient.

Negative externality

Each diner orders unwisely and pays more for the satisfaction they derive from consuming the food. Economists call this negative externality — the cost that others have to bear for the economic decision you take.

Does this mean social dining is inefficient? No. Negative externalities typically occur only if the group is unlikely to meet regularly — like my friend’s reunion group.

All of us typically dine with friends we regularly go out with. Negative externality is minimal in such cases. Why?

Each person in the group takes turn to pay. And each of them knows that if they overindulge now, they will be the victim the next time around!

(The author is an investment strategist.)

More Stories on : Economics | Simple Economics

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page


Stories in this Section
How much cover do I need?


Understanding ratio analysis
Update
FII activity in 2008 — Still some glimmer of hope
Retail loan quality under a cloud
Will dear money policy pay off?
When numbers don’t meet expectations
Bequeathing your legacy to a legatee?
Tourist accommodation in short supply
Benchmarks: Do multi-style managers justify alpha fees?
Mid-cap funds — Bearing the brunt
Franklin India High Growth Fund: Hold
Fund Talk
DSP ML World Gold Fund: Invest
If crude falls further, equities may follow suit
Praj Industries: Hold
3i Infotech: Hold
Parsvnath Developers: Sell
Ipca Labs: Buy
Tech School
Query Corner: What the charts say
Nifty may cool off after a strong opening
Reliance
SBI
Tata Steel
Infosys
Unitech
Reliance Infra
Index Outlook
Low-cost housing, of a high quality
Mumbai warms up to build-and-lease
Food for thought
Baskets of X
Bull's Eye
Prominent bulk deals on NSE & BSE
Covered calls – here is how to use it
Difficult realty market in the next two years
Maximum deduction on fees
Austral Coke: Avoid
Investment Nuggets
Three essential assets of stock trading


Smartbuy



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line