Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Sunday, Jan 11, 2009
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio | Blogs

Investment World
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Investment World - Mutual Funds
Markets - Mutual Funds
Mid-cap funds: Huge value erosion


Suresh Parthasarathy

The year 2008 was bad for equity as an asset class. Irrespective of its market cap and fundamentals, almost every stock listed on the bourses bore the brunt of the bear onslaught (except perhaps, consumer non-durables). Growth sectors suffered the worst.

In such a hugely volatile market, when the BSE Sensex and CNX Nifty lost close to 54 per cent, several mid- and small-cap stocks lost two-thirds of their value.

The worst among the mid-cap lot suffered value erosion of 80 per cent, though the category average was still better than the BSE Midcap Index by five percentage points.

Funds such as ICICI Pru Discovery and HDFC Capital Builder, however, contained losses to minus 55 per cent. These funds were able to do so despite being fully invested in such a market.

Usually, in a bear rally, mid-cap funds recover faster than their large cap peers. However, in any correction following a rally, these stocks equally give up their values.

For instance, during the October correction, Magnum Midcap, JM Small and Midcap and JM Emerging Leaders lost 40-48 per cent. But in the bear rally, they recovered substantially, only to lose the same in the subsequent correction. Over a one-year period Magnum Midcap and JM Small and Midcap lost 72-80 per cent.

Mid-cap funds, though, were not all bad performers; they were able to beat the BSE Sensex and Nifty over a five-year time frame. The category average over this period outpaced both the bellwether indices by eight percentage points (17.6 per cent).

Sectors that dragged

Capital goods, construction, power and infrastructure were the ones that pulled down returns. That funds such as ICICI Pru Discovery and HDFC Capital Builder had lower exposure to construction and power stocks and higher exposure to pharma and banks could have helped them contain the loss.

Magnum Midcap and JM Small and Midcap on the other hand had higher exposure to capital goods, non-ferrous metals and construction that resulted in dragging down the overall returns.

In both cases, they had fully invested in equity; this could also partially explain the losses. In some cases funds that moved to higher cash levels were able to contain losses better.

More Stories on : Mutual Funds | Mutual Funds

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page




Stories in this Section
Make your debut — now


The numbers don’t add up
Corporate frauds over the years
IT: A more vulnerable sector?
SIP moderate fear; set-up equity tilts
Mid-cap funds: Huge value erosion
Update
Fund Talk
Canara Robeco Equity Diversified: Hold
Kotak 30: Invest through SIP
REC: Buy
Nestle India: Buy
Koutons Retail (India): Hold
Tulip Telecom: Buy
Index Outlook
Reliance Ind
SBI
Tata Steel
Infosys
Maruti Suzuki
ONGC
Tech School
Query Corner: What the charts say
A case for special residential zones
PPP, key to affordable housing
Lulu’s Kochi project on track
Dewan Housing Finance cuts rates
When companies go bust, employees suffer the most
Downtrend may continue for Nifty futures
Prominent bulk deals on NSE & BSE
Satyam fiasco brings back the bears
Baskets of X
Bull's Eye
Self-justification
‘Logical to grow via bancassurance’
Get rebate on certain medical expenses
Don’t fall asleep at the ethical wheel


Life



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2009, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line