Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Sunday, Jun 14, 2009
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio | Blogs

Investment World
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Investment World - Economics
Columns - Simple Economics
Extortion fee



We pay bribes ‘to insure prompt service’.

B. Venkatesh

Recently, workers from the State electricity board furiously dug up earth in front of our house to repair the underground cables. After they finished work, they forcefully collected some money and then left, leaving the excavated stones on the road. Why do we bribe these workers to do their jobs?

As Walt Kelly said “We have met the enemy and he is us”. In other words, we are the reason why these workers demand bribes. How?

Supporting corruption

Suppose a clerk at a government office offers to attend your case immediately for Rs 5,000. If you agree to pay, you support corruption. The clerk, encouraged by your bribe, may now demand such amount from others as well.

Now, all of us may be willing to pay to save time so that we can engage in more productive work. The clerk, realising that, will expect money from us just to do his job. When bribe is no longer voluntary, it becomes extortion. We are essentially subsidising the government; otherwise, it has to pay a higher salary to these workers.

It is not surprising that we complain about extortion but never take action. Why? The extortion fee is to “To Insure Prompt Service”. The workers will not otherwise attend to our job the next time around.

Lessons from game theory

We can break-away from this habit by drawing lessons from game theory. Consider “Prisoner’s dilemma”. Two prisoners are kept in separate rooms. If they both confess to a crime, they get rigorous imprisonment. If one confesses, he is set free while the other faces heavy sentence. If both keep quiet, they serve a light sentence.

The “Nash Equilibrium” or the optimal solution to this game is for the prisoners to keep quiet. Similarly, if we all stop paying extortion fees, the workers may eventually decide to work without demanding money. But as in “Prisoner’s Dilemma”, there will then be an incentive for each of us to break the rule (bribe) — to insure prompt service! Does it then pay to be virtuous?

(The author is a self-styled investment psychologist. He can be reached at enhancek@gmail.com)

More Stories on : Economics | Simple Economics

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Savings are not equal to investments: Need for financial literacy


Small is beautiful… but can be risky too
Earn as you spend via card
The foundation is good, but…
Why the regional mix matters
Are dividends worth it?
Does asset size matter?
Tata Pure Equity: Invest
Fund Talk
Update
Reliance Infrastructure: Focussed exposures will help
Jyothy Laboratories (Rs 106.45): Buy
Dr Reddy’s Laboratories: Buy
CRISIL: Buy
Amara Raja Batteries: Buy
Sesa Goa: Buy
Reliance (Rs 2,356.8)
Covert correction in equities
Query Corner: What the charts say
Big demand for smaller space
Reverse mortgage fails to move forward
Knocking at ‘affordable’ doors
Jones Lang LaSalle bags Philips deal
Saving Satyam’s investors
Multiplexes look for hits
Extortion fee
Prominent bulk deals on NSE & BSE
Baskets of X
Bull's Eye
Nifty future may drift downwards
When a wife’s house taxes her husband
Smart investing




The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2009, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line