Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Sunday, Jun 28, 2009
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio | Blogs

Investment World
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Investment World - Economics
Columns - Simple Economics
Choice irrationality



An ‘irrational’ choice may leave you worse off, but that is the price you pay for unfair treatment.

B. Venkatesh

Consider this. My friend earns Rs 1.5 lakh per month with a total annual income of Rs 20 lakh including other benefits. One of his company’s clients wants him to work at their office in Europe for four months. He has been promised an income of Rs 10 lakh in lieu of his existing salary. Should he grab the offer? My friend passed it off. Why? Based on his current salary, he will earn Rs 6 lakh in four months. He has been offered Rs 10 lakh, two-thirds more than his current earnings. Classical economics tells us that he should accept the offer, as it increases his total wealth.

So, why then did he reject the offer? Classical economics assumes that all human beings are rational. That is, given a chance, all of us will strive to maximise our well-being. But that is not true in the behavioural world.

Against principle of fairness

Here is how my friend evaluated the proposal. A person of his skill-set can earn Rs 15 lakh for a four-month period in that country. The company offered him 50 per cent less. That went against the principle of fairness. So, he rejected the offer. Classical economists may scoff at his decision. Behavioural psychologists term this behaviour “choice irrationality”.

The same principle works elsewhere too — in factory strikes and job appraisals. Suppose your annual appraisal has just finished and you expect an increment of Rs 25,000. Your boss in a surprisingly generous mood gives you Rs 40,000. You are obviously ecstatic, till you find out that your colleague received Rs 60,000! How will you react? At the extreme, you may quit your job and join another company, perhaps, for a lower salary. Why? You feel that your boss was unfair in paying you less. Your “irrational” choice leaves you worse off. But that is a price you pay to deal with the unfair treatment.

“Choice irrationality” then shows that my friend’s reaction was normal indeed. Would you have reacted the same way?

(The author is a self-styled investment psychologist. He can be reached at enhancek@gmail.com)

More Stories on : Economics | Simple Economics

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Why higher equity allocation is optimal for long-term investors?


Entry load: Unwarranted misgivings
Update
Have FIIs hit ‘pause’?
Get the best of remittances
Magnum Equity: Hold
Fund Talk
Strides Arcolab (Rs 147.3): Buy
Prominent bulk deals on NSE & BSE
Siemens: Book Profits
UCO Bank: Book Profits
Sintex Industries: Buy
Query Corner: What the charts say
Pratibha Industries: Buy
Date clause binds rebate to share sale
Faint cracks in uptrend
Reliance (Rs 2,028.6)
Prepping to study in the US
Going green makes economic sense too
RICS releases wish-list
Low-cost housing’s slow rise
Tax sops please, we’re realtors
Choice irrationality
US financial reforms: Reining in risk
Baskets of X
Bull's Eye
Nifty future may try to head higher
‘FIIs aren’t turning negative on India’
Money Talk
How to analyse an IPO
Investing and life




The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2009, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line