![]() Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Monday, May 17, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mentor
-
Taxation Columns - For the Asking What we don't see at RoC S. Murlidharan
There seems to be no transparent legal requirement in this regard. Maybe, a conscientious RoC has come out with an internal circular. But the point made by you is well taken. When companies have to work under strict time schedules as far as filing of documents are concerned, a fortiori, the RoC too should be made to work under strict time schedule because otherwise the documents filed on time may lie buried in the heap of papers coming into the RoC's office daily at a torrential pace for days together making inspections an incomplete exercise. The ideal position would be when documents are taken on record on real-time basis, that is, as and when filed. This is possible when companies are given access to the RoC's Web site subject to strict controls so that they can post the information straightaway.
Act of commission
Though the overall rate of commission remains the same, it would be advisedly better for the company to seek fresh approvals because change of facts and circumstances always require such a course. The sanctioning authority must be taken into confidence, lest the company is accused of keeping them in the dark. After all, for all one knows, the Central Government could have sanctioned commissions per activity aggregating to a smaller percentage than what has been sanctioned.
Price discovery
The raison d'etre of a book-building exercise is `price discovery'. The participants bid for shares on offer. The issuer-company, however, is at liberty to set the floor or the minimum price. This floor price is fixed in consultation with the merchant banker. A criticism levelled against the book-building process is that the floor price could mislead the participants, thus frustrating a true price discovery.
Lapsed losses?
No, Section 79 of the Income-Tax Act comes into picture only when there is a change in majority voting power in a closely-held company, whereas in this case the company was admittedly a widely-held one not only as on the last day of the previous year in which the loss was incurred but, more importantly, at the time when the majority voting power changed hands. This is evident from the language of the section which, inter alia, reads: "Where a change in shareholding has taken place in a previous year in the case of a company, not being a company in which the public are substantially interested."
Help me choose
The choice can be exercised in respect of each transaction. You would be perfectly justified in working out the comparative tax liability under either option and choose the one that exposes you to the minimum tax liability.
(ASK! Send in your queries on accounting, auditing, corporate law and taxation to ask@thehindu.co.in)
Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page
|
Stories in this Section |
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2004, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line
|