Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Monday, Jun 27, 2005

Mentor
Features
Stocks
Port Info
Archives

Group Sites

Mentor - Taxation
Columns - Racy Cases


Flutter on flat tax

V. Pattabhi Ram
A. V. Vedpuriswar

THE B-School had invited a star tax practitioner to talk to the Class of 2006 on the basics of taxation. It was an opportunity that the CA grabbed. He had always believed that the syllabi and students at the B-Schools had "style but no substance". He would make them see how shallow they were. As he walked into the class looking extremely prosperous, all suited and booted, the class rose up in awe of the man the nation called TP. No one really knew where the name came from; but it had stuck.

Fifteen minutes into the class, as TP spoke to a spell bound audience, the first crack in his armour began to show. He was speaking on "entry level", "maximum marginal rate" and the "incidence of tax" with a healthy sprinkling of wit and wisdom.

He told them that as good citizens we must pay our taxes. It was then that Boka set the cat among the pigeons. "Sir, taxation in India has become far too complicated for the average Indian; yet tax is too important a subject to be left exclusively in the hands of the tax experts." TP smiled. All his life he had made his money thanks to India's complex tax system. And here was a rookie who wanted to change all that.

"Why can't we have a single tax slab? Say, tax everyone at 20 per cent? Why should we have three slabs 10 per cent, 20 per cent and 30 per cent?" asked Debbie, the baby faced lass, who loved simplicity. "Not to speak of a surcharge that adds insult to injury," remarked Goggles. "You mean have proportional tax and not graduated or progressive tax?" asked Flowers. Seeing a few eyebrows raised, Flowers took it upon himself to elaborate. "A flat tax, (a.k.a proportional tax) is a system that taxes everyone at the same rate, viz., a proportion of income. In contrast, under progressive income tax citizens with higher incomes pay tax at a higher rate than those with lower incomes." A tax is an involuntary fee paid by individuals or businesses to a state, or to functional equivalents of a state, including tribes, secessionist movements or revolutionary movements. Citizenship is membership in a political community (originally a city but now a state), and carries with it rights to political participation; a person having such membership is a citizen. A corporation is a legal entity (distinct from a natural person) that often has similar rights in law to those of a civil law systems and may refer to corporations as moral persons; they may also go by the name AS (anonymous society) or something similar, depending on language. A progressive tax, or graduated tax, is one that is larger as a percentage of income for those with larger incomes. Income tax is a direct tax that is levied on the income of private individuals. A progressive tax, or graduated tax, is one that is larger as a percentage of income for those with larger incomes.

Debbie remembered someone speak at a debate who said that there was a time in India when the maximum marginal rate was 97.5 per cent and that in addition you had to pay a wealth tax of 5 per cent! That is, for every rupee that you earned beyond a point you paid approximately 98 paisa as tax. And on whatever little was left one had to pay wealth tax. Why would one want to earn, the speaker had thundered.

"Sir, does any country adopt flat tax?" asked Debbie. Before TP could answer, Flowers was on a roll. "Eleven years ago, in 1994, Estonia became the first European country to introduce a "flat tax" with a uniform rate of 26 per cent. Latvia 25 per cent, Lithuania and Russia 13 per cent, Slovakia 19 per cent, Ukraine 13 per cent, Serbia 14 per cent, Georgia 12 per cent and Romania 16 per cent." Boka offered an explanation. "The flat-tax movement has hit off in the erstwhile communist countries because these countries were starting from scratch in choosing a tax code and they opted for the one that was simple and efficient." TP was beginning to have second thoughts over his "all style and no substance" argument.

"Why would you think that flat tax is convenient?" he asked. His tone may have conveyed annoyance, but it was put-on to get the best out of the group. Goggles said, "I read somewhere that in the US the cost of administering progressive taxation is about 10 per cent to 20 per cent of revenue collected." Boka offered him support.

"Flat tax is an administrator's joy. As every Rupee is taxed at the same rate, the taxman is not bothered about who is being paid how many rupees. He can simply withhold 20 per cent of a company's payroll, without being concerned about individual pay packs." Debbie added, "But if a second rate of tax is added, the tax collector has to find out how much money is going to whom before he can be sure of collecting the right amount from the right person!"

"Any specific examples?" asked TP. He hadn't counted on his wards having a wide-ranging reading habit. "Flat tax can yield good results," said Flowers. "When in 1994, Estonia repealed its high tax rate on the rich it did not hurt the tax base. Actually that year the revenues rose to 40 per cent of GDP. Ditto in 2002. The country now plans to cut its flat rate from 26 per cent to 20 per cent by 2007." Debbie remarked, "Sir, in Russia in the year 2001, the government combined its 12 per cent, 20 per cent and 30 per cent personal income tax bands into a single 13 per cent rate. A year later tax collections were up by 26 per cent." "Flat and up," concluded Flowers.

Boka decided to offer his spin to the Russian experience. He said, "Flat tax is simple. The government's revenues surged not because the Russians suddenly started working hard, but because tax administration and compliance became easier. So if flat tax is to be introduced in a country, the idea should be sold on the simplicity plank."

"Well, what is wrong with progressive taxation," asked TP. "Is it not wiser to make the rich give up a bigger share of their disposable incomes? Doesn't a flat tax violate this principle?" he asked rhetorically. "No," said Debbie. "A flat tax usually combines a threshold (that is, an exempt amount) with a single rate above it. The system can be made progressive by playing around with these two variables."

Goggles drove another nail, "A flat tax increases the incentive to work, unlike a progressive tax, which discourages extra effort from society's best-paid members. Sir, a graduated income tax is graduated robbery."

Neta, the guy with political ambitions, decided to stand up and be counted in last minutes of the class. "In India we need radical tax reforms. So far we have been playing at the fringes. Our Income-Tax Act needs to be cut down by half. A flat tax will provide the answer. Okay, the leftists might make noise but the tax's sheer convenience and ease of administration hold out the promise of a clean and transparent system, which India badly needs."

The only thing that the class hadn't quoted was Adam Smith's canons of taxation thought TP. As he got ready to respond to their arguments, the gong went.

Racy@thehindu.co.in

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page

Right Florists

Stories in this Section
Stranded in the forex Standard


BPO clients more wary of info security leaks
One question, one too many solutions
On leasing, one more
Rattled by the rate
Flutter on flat tax
The Do Re Mi of Ef Bee Tee
Baskets of `X'
Bull's Eye
Just do IT
Business-a-Verse
Ethics include the entire spectrum of human conduct
Get 'the total economic picture' of your customers
Cartoon Corner


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2005, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line