Change in Indo-Pak ties

Ranabir Ray Choudhury
Comment (4)   ·   print   ·  

It is well-known that the Pakistani military controls Islamabad's foreign policy, particularly so relations with New Delhi. Indeed, it has often been said that the “hotter” the ties between the two neighbours, the more indispensable becomes the Pakistani military to that country's people and society. In other words, the importance of the status of the Pakistani armed forces in Pakistan is a direct function of the state of crisis in relations with India, which suggests that the Pakistani military would always like ties with India to be on the boil.


If this reading is correct, what precisely has happened which has led the Pakistani armed forces to agree to put cooperation with New Delhi in the driver's seat as far as the conduct of Islamabad's foreign policy is concerned?

But is it correct to say that Islamabad is currently engaged in “mending” its fences with India? The most important recent piece of evidence in this direction is the decision to grant most-favoured (MFN) nation status to India which, if implemented effectively, will turn Islamabad's economic policy towards India on its head, so to speak. What makes the decision a crucial one, from the point of view of the further evolution of ties between the two neighbours, is that any disruption in the operation of the MFN status accorded to India would result in a severe trade disturbance, which is likely to throw a chunk of the Pakistani economic set-up off balance.


The Commerce Minister, Mr Anand Sharma, has spoken of a “paradigm shift” in the basis of Indo-Pakistani trade. He is absolutely right because, once the trade relations move on to the MFN-phase, it would be very difficult to rock the boat by, say, scrapping the “negative list”, and replacing it with the old “positive list” of tradable items, in view of the shock it would impart to the Pakistani export economy.

Further, it would become even more difficult to tamper with the MFN status after a few years, because of the (probable) exponential expansion in bilateral trade. The new bilateral trade target, after three years, has been pitched at $6 billion (up from the current $2.7 billion); the expectation is that the potential for the increase is closer to 10 times the official target, which would make the indispensability of maintaining MFN-based trade levels even greater.


The MFN move, however, preceded by a visit to India by the Pakistani Commerce Minister — the first in more than 30 years — is just one of the changes that one sees in Islamabad's foreign policy profile.

On October 23, four Indian military personnel were detained by the Pakistani authorities when their helicopter accidentally crossed the Line of Control, an incident which was mutually settled in no time because of the “cooperation” extended by Islamabad. On October 11, Islamabad signalled its willingness to grant India “a passageway” to Afghanistan, not only to boost bilateral trade ties but also to “promote progress and prosperity in the whole region”, according to the Pakistani Commerce Minister. On November 4, Pakistan agreed to send a commission relating to the Mumbai terror attack, a move which had been hanging fire for the past six months.

Why is the Pakistani military allowing all this to happen? Is it because of the growing rift between Islamabad and Washington, on the one hand, and Beijing's unwillingness to provoke India beyond a point, on the other?

Whatever it is, there is little doubt that, if the present pattern in bilateral ties is allowed to strengthen, the principal beneficiaries will be none other than the people of India and Pakistan, who deserve it.

(This article was published on November 8, 2011)
XThese are links to The Hindu Business Line suggested by Outbrain, which may or may not be relevant to the other content on this page. You can read Outbrain's privacy and cookie policy here.


Why is the Pakistani military allowing all this to happen? Is it because of the growing rift between Islamabad and Washington, on the one hand, and Beijing's unwillingness to provoke India beyond a point, on the other?

Or are Pakistan and China playing the card of MFN on India to lull India to sleep with false hope of peace and progress and give it a real thrashing when they are mutually ready?

from:  Naresh
Posted on: Nov 9, 2011 at 08:07 IST

Naresh is quite right in his query. Nevery trust China and Pakistan. They both are notorious for reneging on their words. Never trust both countries - never ever.

from:  VLN
Posted on: Nov 9, 2011 at 21:15 IST

Grow up, naresh, and give peace a chance. it is skepticism like this, on
both sides, that hampers any chance for peace and settlement.

from:  Ahmed Raza
Posted on: Nov 10, 2011 at 01:52 IST

This relationship is a precursor to a terrorist attack (or Kargil kind). or Pakistan
realizing that India was never an enemy in the first place and putting big military
budget is affecting their people while benefiting their army. This point has been
nailed heavily by USA, Britain and France to Pakistanis. Their problem is within, not
outside. If they continue to antagonize India, their whole system would collapse
and currently is on track where unemployment is sky high, terrorism is keeping its
head high.

On China Front - China doesn't want relations with India to improve, otherwise
India would move budget to China side while it is also concerned about the raise of
terrorism in Pakistan getting exported to China. All this drama is a balancing act
to improve relations to an extent not beyond expectation though.
Pakistanis have low morale these days and the whole country needs revitalization.
Cricket Scam, OBL killing in their own soil. They need us more than we need them.

from:  Dr. SanSri
Posted on: Nov 10, 2011 at 08:44 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor



Recent Article in Opinion

Comments to: Copyright © 2015, The Hindu Business Line.