SEARCH

Dampest squib in a long, long time

B.S. RAGHAVAN
Comment (5)   ·   print   ·  
The Hindu

I have watched the flag hoisting at Delhi’s Red Fort by India’s Prime Ministers and listened to their speeches from its ramparts on the Independence Day of every year for the last 65 years, and I have personally attended the function on 12 occasions, including the most memorable and thrilling address by Jawaharlal Nehru after the very first general election.

Based on that experience, I have no hesitation in saying that there has not been a more inane, insipid, inert and soul-less example of words strung together to little purpose than the latest speech by the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

It reads like the annual day report of the headmaster of a school, although Baba Ramdev has been charitable enough to give it a slightly higher status saying that it reminded him of “the Planning Commission’s report”.

Even Deve Gowda’s speech in 1996 drew praise from V. P. Singh and was said to have “conquered several hearts”.

The people look upon their Prime Minister as one who is sensitive enough to understand their aspirations and concerns.

The ones weighing the most heavily on the people’s minds this year are the disturbed conditions in Assam, the retaliatory violence in Mumbai, the mounting tide of corruption and the rising prices.

DISQUIETING

Imagine how he could have electrified the nation if he came to them straightaway and outlined the Government’s approach in intelligible and empathetic terms.

But all that the Prime Minister had to say was that the incidents were “very unfortunate” and that “our government will make every effort to understand the reasons behind the violence and work hard with the state governments to ensure that such incidents are not repeated in any part of the country.”

Can there be a phraseology more disquieting than the Government making “every effort to understand the reasons behind the violence”?

Haven’t the reasons been there for all to see ever since self-serving politicians began building up and nurturing vote banks of illegal immigrants in the past 50 years or so?

Manmohan Singh has nary a word on the violence unleashed in Mumbai in the aftermath of Assam.

Again, the whole nation is in a state of anger and outrage over the daily torture of corruption to which the aam aadmi is subjected, the surging scandals beclouding the Government’s credibility, with the integrity of several Ministers having been called into question, and the consequent unrest among the people in the form of movements such as those of Anna Haazare and Baba Ramdev.

Hear the PM’s drab words on this: “The Lok Sabha has cleared the Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill. We hope that all political parties will help us in passing this Bill in the Rajya Sabha…. We will continue our efforts to bring more transparency and accountability in the work of public servants and to reduce corruption.”

The Wall Street Journal has made a word count and come up with the finding that just five per cent of his speech focused on corruption compared to 26 per cent when he spoke from the Red Fort last year.

SOARING LANGUAGE

Just see how the President Pranab Mukherjee deals with these issues: “Anger against the bitter pandemic of corruption is legitimate, as is the protest against this plague that is eroding the capability and potential of our nation…The people have a right to express their discontent…When authority becomes authoritarian, democracy suffers; but when protest becomes endemic, we are flirting with chaos. Democracy is a shared process. We all win or lose together… Sometimes (Parliament’s) rhythm sounds a bit atonal; but in a democracy there is always judgment day, an election….

“It is particularly painful for me to witness the violence in Assam. Our minorities need solace, understanding and protection from aggression…Concrete attempts have been made to heal the wounds of Assam…We should revisit them, and adapt them to present conditions in the spirit of justice and national interest…”

I think the Prime Minister would do well to borrow the services of the speech writer of the President. Both in his acceptance speech in Parliament after his election as President, and his address to the nation on August 15 this year, Mukherjee excelled himself in soaringly evocative language.

Manmohan Singh would have made a tremendous impact by simply substituting his Red Fort speech by Pranab Mukherjee’s Independence Day address!

(This article was published on August 16, 2012)
XThese are links to The Hindu Business Line suggested by Outbrain, which may or may not be relevant to the other content on this page. You can read Outbrain's privacy and cookie policy here.

Comments:

There is no point in criticising a speech when words need to be accompanied by action. For e.g. Indira Gandhi made stirring speeches - but to what effect ? The nation suffered under her authoritarian, misdirected, corrupt regime. When the UPA2 govt has delivered nothing and promises to deliver nothing till the end of the tenure, even a direct, clear speech would have done nothing to uplift the country's morale.

from:  unknown indian
Posted on: Aug 17, 2012 at 10:38 IST

Correct, the Prime Minister's speech was depressing and disappointing. Admitted ,he is
not a great orator. But a better speech could have been prepared and read, as he is in
the habit of reading prepared texts. When can we have a PM making an extempore
speech from Red Fort?

from:  pjmenon
Posted on: Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49 IST

The author must be one among the very few who listen to PM's speeches on
every Independence Day. In my recent memory, except in the the year
1999 when Kargil war was fought , it had no appeal. Even central
government bureaucrats in Delhi, it was reported had stopped attending
these redundant rituals, so they had to be threatened with disciplinary
actions.

from:  R.Sundaram
Posted on: Aug 17, 2012 at 12:15 IST

PM is old , westernized , carefully silent in addressing his own party men( read Indians) . He is care full to maintain his Clean image and hence he touched no dirt. For him the speech is an office routine , he finished his agenda. Freedom for him means , freedom to keep mum despite entire India in turmoil due to rampant coruption with many of his cabinet colleagues in Jail or in Bail . He is happy that some embarrassing governances were taken over by Supreme court. He is relieved of his duty, to that extent . His tone was very normal- no emotional blend of confidence. Now a days our School Head masters are ,in pursuit ,of impressing correspondents speak loud .

from:  ARVIND
Posted on: Aug 17, 2012 at 14:41 IST

Tables have turned. Indeed if the President;s speech had been read out
it would have cheered all those present and the nation as well. But
there is little point in blaming the PM. Easlryu elfcitons and change of
govt. is what we need.

from:  s.subramanyan
Posted on: Aug 17, 2012 at 18:10 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
Comments to: web.businessline@thehindu.co.in. Copyright © 2014, The Hindu Business Line.