Are the Saudis in the wrong corner?

Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir faced some difficult questions in Washington on January 20, following a meeting with Secretary of State John Kerry. The visit to Washington took place amidst reports that the desert kingdom was set to acquire nuclear weapons from Pakistan, in response to perceived threats from Iran. A day earlier, Kerry had warned both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia against partnering in any transfer or deployment of Pakistani nuclear weapons in Saudi Arabia. He bluntly stated that there would be “all kinds of NPT consequences” if any such transfer took place.

Responding to queries on Kerry’s comments, Jubeir retorted: “I will not discuss these things in a public forum, certainly not on television.” While not ruling out a Pakistani nuclear umbrella to guarantee his country’s security, Jubeir averred: “Saudi Arabia is committed to two things. I always say two things we do not negotiate over — our faith and our security. Saudi Arabia will do what it takes in order to protect its security.”

Referring to his discussions with Kerry, Jubeir said: “I discussed the bilateral relationship with Pakistan, which is a strategic one. We discussed the regional situation and ways to promote security and stability in the region. We discussed the negative and aggressive Iranian interference and the affairs of the region.” He predictably lashed out at Iran, saying: “Iran should cease support for terrorism. Iran should cease to assassinate diplomats and blow up Embassies.” (This was perceived as a condemnation of alleged Iranian attacks on Israeli diplomatic missions). For good measure, Jubeir added: “Iran should cease its negative propaganda in the region”, while adding that the nuclear deal with Iran would “release billions of dollars” for funding its “nefarious activities”.

The concerns expressed by Kerry came after meetings that Saudi Arabia’s Deputy Crown Prince and Defence Minister Mohammed bin Sultan had with General Raheel Sharif and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on January 10. After meeting Prince Salman in his office in Rawalpindi, Raheel Sharif warned that any threat to Saudi Arabia’s territorial integrity would evoke a strong response from Pakistan.

His nominal boss, the prime minister, was more circumspect, telling Prince Salman that the “people of Pakistan will always stand by the people of Saudi Arabia”, while averring that defence ties with Saudi Arabia were held in “high esteem”. Saudi Arabia has, however, rejected a Pakistani offer to promote dialogue with Iran, though the Pakistani offer has been welcomed in Washington and Moscow.

Saudi Arabia has been assiduously wooing Pakistan, ever since it found out that it had landed itself in a military quagmire in Yemen, where its relentless bombing campaign has led to the displacement of 2.5 million Yemenis. Today, 78 per cent of the Yemeni population is in desperate need of water, food and medical assistance.

Despite the fierce and unrelenting bombing, the resistance to the Saudis, spearheaded by the Shia Houthi population and former President Abdulla Saleh, has been resolute in preventing Yemen’s takeover by a Saudi nominee, such as former President Mansur Hadi. Saudi diplomatic woes have been compounded by the US-led deal to end global sanctions on Iran and a stern warning by Russia’s President Putin that “Saudi Arabia will be utterly destroyed and annihilated” if it falls out of line, with military intervention in Syria.

Shortly after the Saudi intervention in Yemen commenced, Nawaz Sharif was welcomed personally at Riyadh Airport on March 3, 2015, by King Salman bin Abdul Aziz, together with Crown Prince Mukri and the entire Saudi cabinet. This was a rare honour, especially for the leader of a country that has depended for decades on Saudi doles and handouts.

But the Saudis obviously had high expectations from Nawaz Sharif, whom they saved from possible execution and sheltered, after the Musharraf coup, in October 1999. More important was a low-key visit to Riyadh, a few weeks earlier, by Pakistan’s seniormost military officer who oversees the Strategic (Nuclear) Forces Command — the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, General Rashad Mahmoud.

Subsequent developments have made it clear that Pakistan will be unable to commit forces to back the Saudi military misadventure in Yemen. But nuclear ties between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia go back decades, commencing with Saudi financing of Pakistan’s nuclear ambitions in the 1970s.

The Defence Minister, Prince Salman, was given unprecedented access to the Kahuta uranium enrichment and missile facilities headed by AQ Khan, popularly described as the chairman of “Pakistan’s Nuclear Walmart”, just prior to Pakistan’s nuclear tests. Khan, thereafter, paid visits to Saudi Arabia, in the following years.

Significantly, just after the visits of General Mahmud and Nawaz Sharif to Riyadh, Pakistan tested its 2,750-km range Shaheen 3 missile, which could well replace the obsolete CSS 2 missiles supplied by Beijing to Riyadh in the 1980s. The Chinese missiles have an adequate range to target Tehran. Pakistan’s Shaheen missiles in Pakistan are, moreover, originally of Chinese design. The visit of President Xi Jinping to Saudi Arabia and Tehran clearly demonstrates the dexterity of Chinese diplomacy in the oil-rich Gulf region. Saudi insecurities resulting from the virtual u-turn in American policies following the nuclear deal with Iran are being addressed by China, with Beijing’s “all-weather friend” Pakistan signalling that it has missiles that can replace the Chinese missiles.

Differences between Iran and Pakistan over Afghanistan will likely continue, as a Wahhabi-oriented, Taliban-dominated, Pakistan-sponsored regime in Kabul will be seen as threatening in Iran and neighbouring Central Asian Republics. It remains to be seen if the Saudis return to their earlier policies of support for a Pakistan-sponsored, Taliban-dominated set-up in Kabul.

Both Iran and Saudi Arabia have pledged to treat China as their “most favoured customer” for oil supplies. This should not cause undue concern in India, given the global glut in oil supplies and the re-emergence of Iraq as a significant player in world energy markets.

India will, however, have to move much faster in dealing with crucial projects such as the development of the Chabahar port in Iran, and in the development of undersea gas pipelines. We have to recognise that the inexcusable delays in implementation of projects abroad, such as the Kaladan corridor in Myanmar and the parliament building in Kabul, have tarnished our image and reputation.

The writer is a former High Commissioner to Pakistan

COMMENT NOW